or is it too late? Now that N. Korea has the bomb, should the free world stand idly by and just let Iran develop its own nuclear weapons? Perhaps the time is right NOW for Israel, backed by the USA of course, to attack Irans nuclear facilities.
Any ideas anyone?
2006-10-10 23:25:15 · 13 answers · asked by analyst 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
A long time ago a Roman Emperor named Caligulea said " let them [ the barbarians-goths-jutes-franks-celtics-ostragoths-visigoths-Germanic tribes..and many more ], hate so long as they fear " Do we really want to continue down that path?
2006-10-10 23:32:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
BY your logic should France attack USA nuclear facilities should China get Pakistan and does it give Iran the same justification to attack America where is the logic mate what makes America in the right to have Nukes and Iran And Noth Korea not and dont say because they have crazy leader b4 you say that look at George.Wanker Bush second of all if AMerica israel attack iran, iran can choose not give oil out or disarm the travelling of oil they have alot of power and if they do attack it is obviosly an attack stirred up by desperatness on both israel and america as they have both been dissapointed by trying to attack middle eastern contries and they really wanna get a (win) YOU CANT WIN IN WAR
2006-10-10 23:49:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"If Israel/usa assaults Iran with missiles, is that not an act of conflict?" i've got in no way heard all people argue otherwise. "would not Iran be totally justified to lob some missiles an afternoon at diverse & random objectives in Israel for years on end?" If Israel attacked Iran, that must be seen an act or conflict, and Iran could be entitled to attack. What objectives could be seen valid could be yet another question fullyyt. Israel isn't liable to attack "diverse & random objectives" in Iran by way of fact the super geography of Iran could require very specific focused on. If Israel attacked Iran, that's in all probability they could in basic terms bypass after objectives they believed have been militia; Iran could be predicted to do the comparable, although the technologies obtainable would not grant the precision, and Iranian assaults could in all probability look random.
2016-10-16 01:47:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should the 'non-free world' attack US and Israel for having nuclear bombs?
2006-10-10 23:33:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think both are not in a state of attack on Iran, they are still in war. I don't think so they will do this blunder specialy in a case of Iran, which is not Iraq neither lebnon.
2006-10-10 23:36:20 · answer #5 · answered by aarshi72 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think N. Korea who made the bomb not iran
2006-10-11 02:25:26 · answer #6 · answered by Peiper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's just take out the leadership and see if the next group is more reasonable .
Same goes for N.Korea .
2006-10-10 23:31:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no the time is not right.
how ever if there were iranians as observers
at this test , as there were with the goofy missle
launches,
this is something that should be disclosed on the floor
of the u.n. with all members taking it in,
then the time is right.
2006-10-10 23:35:48 · answer #8 · answered by john john 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, I think this would be a bad idea and a bad move, it will not solve anything, just make matters worse.
2006-10-10 23:28:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that they were just kidding when they said they wanted to destroy Israel and the U S. We should send them flowers and democrats. and a coke awww
2006-10-10 23:39:32 · answer #10 · answered by workin_man66 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋