http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/06/980610082901.htm
read it and weep all you creationist stone agers!
2006-10-10 18:23:21 · 15 answers · asked by GobleyGook 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Cool! Scientists have come one step closer to finding out how Goddidit. Isn't it interesting that He would develop such sophisticated tools using just the physical laws of the universe? And of course, atheists have to misinterpret all of this as 'coincidence' and 'Chance'.
None are so blind as those who WILL NOT see the Glory of God.
2006-10-11 02:34:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then where did the planet come from. When you build a house you don't start with the roof.
All science is discovery not invention. Evolution is a theory not a scientific fact or any thing else. I may be in the best interest of your brain to look up the word synthetic. No one found a fossil that went extinct they created something fake to fit a theory like the bones that aren't real humans. They make clothe from sand and oil but they can't make wool.
Where did carbon come from what about all the other elements why do they combine. We know why but not how.
If you read the firs two verses of Genesis you will find out what came before our current world. Some one has misinterpreted scripture to you.Perhaps you never read it at all.
2006-10-10 18:51:15 · answer #2 · answered by timex846 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Post again when they create LIFE. You can take ALL the molecules you want and put them in the primordial soup and mix it until the cows come home and you will not create a single celled orgnism. It has been tried
2006-10-10 18:29:53 · answer #3 · answered by jadamgrd 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Doesn't prove anything except that the scientists have way too much time on their hands.
2006-10-10 23:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by Southern Apostolic 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your DEE DEE DEE.
DNA paterns make a combination of the number of protiens, to about 10 to the 600th power.
Uh yea. Try again.
2006-10-10 18:26:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
OK--Interesting.
But now I have to ask these Jerks.
Where did the stuff, Jazz, or matter that was used IN THE VERY BEGINNING come from?
2006-10-10 18:25:49 · answer #6 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the superb-user-friendly absolute dating technique is carbon-14 dating, which archaeologists choose to apply. although, the only million/2-existence of carbon-14 is in basic terms 5730 years, so the physique of recommendations won't be in a position for use for components older than approximately 70,000 years. Radiometric dating includes using isotope sequence, at the same time with rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead, all of that have very lengthy one million/2-lives, beginning from 0.7 to 40 8.6 billion years. diffused adjustments in the relative proportions of the two isotopes grants solid dates for rocks of any age. With present day, somewhat precise, techniques, errors bars are frequently purely one million% or so.
2016-12-16 05:44:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sites like this one often have all sorts of advertisements trying to sell me a new phone, while knowledgeable, well-explained sites have almost no advertisements. I'd get better evidence from a different site if I were you, it'll help.
2006-10-10 18:27:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It is an artificial creation not by natural process. It is a forced thing not a natural thing.
2006-10-10 18:29:32 · answer #9 · answered by Adyghe Ha'Yapheh-Phiyah 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When you get a chance go to Kent Hovind's web site. You just might enjoy it.
2006-10-10 18:26:21 · answer #10 · answered by ice 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋