English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

....Only time will tell.

But, I think we all can agree, it would have served us better if North Korea never exploded that bomb.

2006-10-10 14:54:12 · answer #1 · answered by marnefirstinfantry 5 · 0 1

very little. Although its probably not great for the people or animals within a certain amount around ground zero. When the Americans did their tests in the desert, Las Vegas grew out of it.
Tell Kim Jong Ill I'd like to put $500 on Red!!

2006-10-10 21:56:55 · answer #2 · answered by buckole5 2 · 0 1

Every indication is that they were bluffing,, no nuke was tested... BUT, we did test nukes several times above ground in new mx. I have been there and there is no indication that it ever happened, there are pistachio orchards close by and large onion and garlic fields.. Life goes on .. The bombs dropped on japan to end ww2 had no serious long term effect on japan and there is no residual effect.. You worry way too much over minutia, but if you want something real to ponder over: The result of tolerating adultry and homosexuality is a cancer to the nation that allows it.. and it will destroy that nation uterly ..

2006-10-11 01:12:48 · answer #3 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0 1

Not much really. It was underground if it did occur. They're still not sure of yield if it was successful test.

2006-10-10 22:10:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers