Is it true that you can't empirically test Intelligent Design (creationism)?

Question

That's what one of the "founders" of I.Design, Michael Behe said under oath in the Dover trial, and he went on to admit that therefore, ID is NOT science.
(and he's the only one with any scientific credentials in that movement)


Yet I have empirically tested who is most annoying on R&S YA! (they were fireball & nikki). [seemyblog]

Do you NOW see the importance of collecting empirical data to test your hypotheses?

Do you NOW have a new appreciation for the empirical? the basis for science?

I hope the today's little study will make you appreciate the need for science in promoting real progress.

Thank you, FSM Bless, and goodnight.

Answer 1

I became a Pastafarian tonight. Bless you FSM.

Answer 2

As someone who has taken a number of psychology & sociology classes I have always appreciated just how much work it is to do a proper study. Done properly the results are solid and factual and cannot be argued against. Since I work in science I have always had an appreciation for the exacting nature of it.

May the FSM bless you, RAmen.