If you weren't so ignorant you would know many beliefs are held in ignorance. So in your enlightened state why don't you try to help the ignorant instead of belittle and castigate them?
2006-10-10 13:03:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by atlaspi 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends where you live and how the courts work. In America, for the most part, no. There is freedom of speech with some provisions of course. However, the best way to answer this entire question is think like the courts... "What would a reasonable person believe?" Reasonable meaning what would a jury most likely say? Most would say the logic is there but the practical application is not.
2006-10-10 11:36:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
equivalent applies with scientific professionals. Of course, we would attempt to do away with scientific professionals who are unable, yet formerly than scientific professionals can help persons, in many cases he needs to step up and assume out of the sphere. generally, it is stunning, and robotically this is unsuitable. We make suitable and flawed errors. yet for sure, we continuously to locate excuses. once you have have been given given your life to the well-being practitioner, you will possibly now not have not placed diverse strategies to assist your self already. So enable's destiny settle on. So the federal government will ought to make investments income competing in drug shape or discoveries with own sectors. government will ought to not least confusing be loosely controlling the drug business enterprise, yet additionally must be in the drug business enterprise with a view to relish how lots revenue and overpriced products drug business enterprise have made and marked. apart from, we want extra preventive care than persistent care. If we are able to human beings the excellent thank you to maintain their well-being in tact, we would be ready to restrict somewhat some different continual ailments. The gymnasium is in many cases too intense priced to 3 persons, so may be we ought to continuously have extra well-being midsection for people who ought to ascertain at extra attainable components. we've have been given to purpose at probability inhabitants using actuality least confusing conscious human beings might use those. And it does not help the remainder of the inhabitants.
2016-10-19 04:10:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religous beliefs require invoking the supernatural for something.
Ignorance is just stupidity or lack of knowledge. I don't see the connection, so no.
If it's your belief that you should be allowed to be ignorant the rest of your life, fine. But we shouldn't have to let you vote.
2006-10-10 11:34:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by eri 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would say ignorance has much to do with religion or at least followers of religion. People are taught not to question their god. How convenient! Keep 'em dumb so they won't question your authority. That's genius!
2006-10-10 11:38:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gene Rocks! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ignorance has nothing to do with religion. In fact, ignorance can also be considered a lack of believes...
2006-10-10 11:33:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by fireangel 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes it is, and unfortunately there are many people who wordship
2006-10-10 11:36:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sirena 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i think that i speak for a lot of individuals when i say "I don't want to hear that"
2006-10-10 11:35:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Guy 29 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's great , you just described me when I was agnostic.
2006-10-10 15:20:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Say what?
2006-10-10 11:35:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by reformed 3
·
0⤊
1⤋