Many people said yes to my prior question, but does that mean that the child has a right to demand your services at saving her from drowning?
2006-10-10 07:39:54 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AouDp4CkPAMtxOKPIwa3o2vsy6IX?qid=20061010111818AAEAwj7
2006-10-10 07:49:53 · update #1
The child has no rights - but we must provide a life saving device and place it in their hands - then they must choose to accept it and pull themselves to safety - a person drowning has only the right to grab the life saving device!
Just as we must choose life - or it will not be given!
2006-10-10 07:54:14 · answer #1 · answered by Gladiator 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The child's rights aren't the main issue. It is a case of black and white-you either save them or if needs be die trying or do nothing in which case you have an obligation to kill yourself for being a coward. There is no choice.
2006-10-10 14:55:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no would say not demand for all that is born must die and it may be the child has completed her agenda on this plane of existence and needs to move on to the next plane.
2006-10-10 14:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not only if he was a child but even if he was an athlete..if humans don't save each other from death then we've lost our humanity.
I saw your first question so crouded with answers so I decided to begin from this one.
2006-10-10 14:48:48 · answer #4 · answered by mido 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋