2006-10-10 07:29:44 · 10 answers · asked by trouthunter 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Because to their masters it's a propaganda war, not a science war. Their main objective is to promote ignorance and misinformation about Science (Evolution and anything else they don't like) to their flock and to the general public. They don't care about the scientific validity of their propaganda, as long as it sounds good in a soundbite. eg. the foolish "thermodynamics" argument above.
2006-10-10 08:50:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Pseudo science? You mean like the laws of thermodynamics? Or maybe you mean the law of impenetrability. Wait, I know, it's the theory of relativity! Or maybe it's the laws of radioactive half-lifes? Maybe that's the pseudo-science you're referring to. No? Maybe the principle of the cooling magma in the earth. Or the refutation of the magical cloud that makes comets somewhere in the universe. That the one? Or is it historical science that is the pseudo science?
Seriously...
The fact that evolutionists disagree with simple scientific laws doesn't make those scientific laws pseudo-science. Laws, such as thermodynamics, don't explain anything, they just describe things. This is why creationists use them, because they are unbiased statements which gauge the validity of a theory. And the word is cite, not site.
Forgive my shortness, but I grow weary of the same question being asked over and over again. Especially since it should be asked in the science and mathematics section.
2006-10-10 07:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by GodsKnite 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because they can't debunk true science. In fact they avoid even looking at it, lest they be "contaminated" by real evidence, and forced to consider the possibility that their personal guesses concerning the meaning of Scripture might be way off the mark.
2006-10-10 08:08:43 · answer #3 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Anybody who got there science information from actual scientists would see just how real evolution is. It is quite hard to cite a credible source if the only place your getting your information from is Dr. Dino.
2006-10-10 07:41:04 · answer #4 · answered by kazejinzo1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because most people are canonized in their beliefs at an early age, and now they are no longer capable of changing their paradigms by which they lead their lives. Look how many years it took for people to believe that the earth was not really flat dispite all the proof to the contrary. Almost 400 years.
2006-10-10 07:33:21 · answer #5 · answered by wizard8100@sbcglobal.net 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We do? Like what? The fossil record? Or micro-evolution?
2006-10-10 07:36:38 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why can't scientist create life from non-living material just like it happened in the Big Bang theory?
Because they can't!
2006-10-10 07:33:07 · answer #7 · answered by Gladiator 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
There is nothing disproving creation..evolution doesn't mean that creation is false..whty can't they co-exist?
2006-10-10 07:42:07 · answer #8 · answered by mido 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Like...
2006-10-10 07:31:31 · answer #9 · answered by Daniel K 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do evolutionists do the same thing?
2006-10-10 08:33:32 · answer #10 · answered by pennypincher 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋