*****APPLAUSE******
Well said and true, none the less.
You did.........
Get a Grip.
Congrats
2006-10-10 04:48:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Get A Grip 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bingo.
And if you say it's ok so long as it's not done before X number of weeks because before then, the fetus can't do this and that - well, who died and made you God?
Using that logic, an autistic kid is less worthy of life than a zygote.
A zygote is following his natural developmental path and will someday be able to "do this and that" while an autistic kid NEVER will.
BTW there is NO room for pragmatism here.
If you cite pragmatic reasons then you MUST be for population control. Let's all live in the world of Logans' Run where people are exterminated at age 35 to keep the population down, or have a lottery where we kill off the "winners" or take Hitler's example of eliminating "useless eaters"
2006-10-10 05:03:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Salami and Orange Juice 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where I live, the reason why people (White or Black or Mexican or Indian, etc....) have 3 - 12 kids is not to keep their race from dying out. We are ALL part of the Human Race and I don't see it dying out any time soon, short of a nuclear blast. But here, they have those many kids to get... WELFARE. To get, Your tax dollars so they can sit on their butts at home and do nothing. Now, not saying that's a good reason for abortion, it isn't.... but that is their reasoning to have so many kids. It is not to "save their race".
As I've said before, I don't agree with most of the reasons given for abortion... but to say NEVER do it, is silly and extremist in thinking. And I want to see the Pro-Lifers who take the homeless kids we have now into their own homes. Instead of shouting how wrong it is to abort, PROVE you want to do something about the children we have NOW.
2006-10-10 05:20:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kithy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You talk of not letting our species die, but our species is less likely to die out over any other species on the planet. What programs are put into place for those who chose to keep their child instead of the alternative, abortion? Nearly none.
People scream and carry on that abortion is murder, but would they willingly take those children into their home if the child is abandoned? They are condemning these children to murder anyway, because the parents are probably incompetent, and the choice to have an abortion would be best.
2006-10-10 04:45:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
What approximately rape, incest, 12 and 13 year previous babies who're pregnant. What correct to the females who're on beginning administration taking it religiously alongside with utilising condoms that still get pregnant. What correct to the females who will die if the being pregnant is finished. What if the infant will die besides, or be born as a vegetable. What if it became unlawful? human beings would nonetheless do it, and in volatile procedures. It wasn't too some time past whilst that became the case. the two way that's going to likely be finished, recover from it. Do you think of professional-choicers like abortions. maximum persons do no longer recommend it, we in basic terms settle for that it rather is an decision. i visit in no way get one myself until something is awfully incorrect, yet that doesn't recommend i visit implement that comparable view on every person else. permit your God make the alternative as to how incorrect it rather is and help those finding for help with out making your self the only in the incorrect by being insulting and vicious to those you do no longer even understand.
2016-12-26 15:12:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you have to be so mean? Have you gotten very far getting to people to listen to you by insulting them? Try some empathy or common sense. I happen to be an anti-abortion/pro-lifer but I'm obviously not the same as you at all.
2006-10-10 04:46:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by mommaof4 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with most of what you said except the rich white folks killing their kids. Where does that come from and do you have evidence to support it?
2006-10-10 04:45:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stiletto ♥ 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Alright, braniac, I'll go with your summation. Answer me this: Is it better to birth a child into a world of neglect and poverty, practically ensuring that the cycle continues, or is it preferable to take a trip down to the clinic and spare the kid all of the bullshit of bad and/or uninterested parents?
Abortion is a necessary evil. No one celebrates it, no one thinks it's a good thing. But I would hate to live in a place where it was not an option.
2006-10-10 04:46:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by mutterhals 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
It's not just rich, white folks, Bubba. But, I agree with you, I pity the fools.
2006-10-10 04:46:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Red neck 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
So what about the women who didn't make the CHOICE to have sex, ie. rape?
I like raven7night's explanation. Yes it's life. So are bacteria, insects, fungus, etc. But I'm sure you kill them on a regular basis.
2006-10-10 04:50:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ontario ashley 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
"CELLULAR DIVISION=GROWTH=LIFE"
Ants are alive too, yet many children toast em with magnifying glasses (I never did, thought it was cruel). Ants are more complete and complex life forms than an embryo in the earliest stages.
2006-10-10 04:48:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by raven7night 4
·
3⤊
1⤋