4 cents, and a what 4 retard!
2006-10-10 04:21:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Prophecy+History=TRUTH 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Hindu religion doesn't accept evolution, if that is what you're getting at. Or maybe you are just being sarcastic in response to fundamentalist complaints that science is involved with Satan in a plot to discredit the bible. In that case, I would agree that it is ridiculous.
The Hindu myth of creation goes something like this...
This universe existed in the shape of darkness, unperceived, destitute of distinctive marks, unattainable by reasoning, unknowable, wholly immersed, as it were, in deep sleep.
Then the Divine Self-existent, himself indiscernible but making all this, the great elements and the rest, discernible, appeared with irresistible power, dispelling the darkness.
He who can be perceived by the internal organ alone, who is subtle, indiscernible, and eternal, who contains all created beings and is inconceivable, shone forth of his own will.
He, desiring to produce beings of many kinds from his own body, first with a thought created the waters, and placed his seed in them.
That seed became a golden egg, in brilliancy equal to the sun; in that egg he himself was born as Brahma, the progenitor of the whole world....
The Divine One resided in that egg during a whole year, then he himself by his thought divided it into two halves;
And out of those two halves he formed heaven and earth, between them the middle sphere, the eight points of the horizon, and the eternal abode of the waters.
From himself he also drew forth the mind, which is both real and unreal, likewise from the mind ego, which possesses the function of self-consciousness and is lordly.
Moreover, the great one, the soul, and all products affected by the three qualities, and, in their order, the five organs which perceive the objects of sensation.
But, joining minute particles even of those six, which possess measureless power, with particles of himself, he created all beings.
Notice that it is quite similar to the Judaic creation myth.
But both are myths, just the same.
2006-10-10 11:28:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by elchistoso69 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well Fact and Truth needs no payments and commissions to prove .
We need no marketing staff to market our ideas reason
Hinduism is a religion of science .
Scientists could only tell the age of Earth early 20th century ,but even an illiterate hindu in India could tell the age of earth is in billions and it has been documented in vedas as early as 6000 B.C
We know that earth is sperical 2300 years ago and even this is documented .
we know that there is possibilty of many earth like planets in the universe and even this is documented as early as 6000 B.C
We know the process from single celled organism to the current day man and even this is documented 6500 years in Manu samhita.(read it)
When the world knows nothing called species 840.000 plus species were catagorised in Manu samhita or manu dharma sastra.
When world knows nothing called law we have a written law in manu samhita ( read it)
When world knows nothing called accounting we had the best political Economist Kautilya Who has written Artha sastra 2300 years ago .This is the best book on political economics , taxation and accounting.
When all other religions taught that sex is a sinful act Hinduism is the only religion which proclaimed that sex is a pious deed since a man and women involve in a creation ( child) we were taught Tantra and lessons and positions of sex and remember the World knows the Superiority of Kama sutra written by Vatsayana 2300 years ago .Vatsayasana himself tells in the introduction that prior to his book on sex there were 6 books on the same and he is taking the best of them and adding to them .
For all the above Facts Hindus paid nothing and thats the reason though there are many scientific things in it ,you can say Hinduism a religion of science , it is not getting the market share it is supposed to get.
2006-10-10 11:50:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by aathrey 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your question isn't even well formed, let alone your hypothesis...
I think they'd have to pay a vast amount of money world wide to a whole manner of different scientists. But considering a vast amount of scientists have their own religion don't you think someone might have mentioned it by now? And where would the Hindu religion get this vast amount of money from?
2006-10-10 11:25:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
none. What do you have against hindus? I am actually Catholic, but i dont criticize others just becasue of their religion. It is their right to believe any religion they want and if you believe in any religion it is your duty to love all people.
2006-10-10 11:22:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Did you just escape from an asylum for the insane?
2006-10-10 11:27:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rajan S 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
you are narrow minded and discriminating.
monkey god?
would you like if i called your god transgendered ars**ole. no.
next time think when you ask a question.
2006-10-10 11:30:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by ~maryjane~ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
probably one-one-hundredth of what christians pay scientists to prove the nonsense in the bible -- which they never do. but christians need it to think that their cult has value.
2006-10-10 11:22:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You cannot deny indian heritage, just because you dislike it
2006-10-11 05:32:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WTF---------------- Their believe is just a ******* stupid as all the others. rrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetardddddddddddddddddd.
2006-10-10 11:26:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by catsht04 1
·
0⤊
0⤋