Fine arts in public education and its importance should it stay or is science and math more important?

Question

Is fine arts (music, drama, creative writing, and art) should be permanent components of public school system crriculm.

Answer 1

I believe the fine arts are equally important as the basics: science, math, english, etc in public education. If you have never taken an art history class, i encourage you to do so, you will find that it "rounds out" your general knowledge of the world, I took my first Art History class in Highschool and I was hooked, I now have a bachelor's in Art History. Also, to understand the subject matter of many of the paintings and works that you study in Art History you must have some science and math in your background, so it works boths ways!

Answer 2

The fine arts are as equal in importance as math and science. While a person is creating an art object, the mind is working in all different directions and solving problems. Math and science can also be used in the artistic process. Take pottery, for example. Besides creating the piece, it then needs to be fired. First thing is to dry the piece (obvious), next as it's heated up it must be held at about the boiling point of water to drive off any residual moisture so it won't turn to steam and burst the piece ( still obvious). The next is not so obvious. You must hold the piece at the temperature which will drive off the moisture that is in chemical bond with the other elements. Her you have a little chemistry involved and an understanding of earth sciences as the silica in the clay vitrifies.

Of course, when the piece is fired it must also be glazed. Now you can buy premixed glazes, or you can have the formulas available to mix your own glazes and these are usually given as percentages. Here you have math involved. Weigh it out on a triple beam balance and you involve the metric system (make sure the triple beam is secured with a lock, they have a tendency to disappear).

The important thing is that art and music education will improve a students math and science scores (From the booklet "Art and the Intellect" by Harold Taylor published by The Museum Of Modern Art, New York).

The most important reason for funding an arts education is that it gives those students who are not scholars or athletes a place to shine in their own right. You get a kid who fells left out or is falling through the cracks a way to express himself. Imagine walking through the school with something he created and some jock comes up and asks, " Did you do that? Wow, that's cool." and the next thing you know, the kid feels he has some value, too. It seems to me that we didn't have school shootings until after we started reducing funding for the arts and shop classes.

By all means, the arts should fully funded.

Answer 3

Lets say that a school district has to cut back. They just don't have the funds for everything. I would get rid of some of the sports first. Then probably drama (since at least in my hometown they had a community college that did plays with open auditions.) Then art. While it enriches the lives of many of the students, it is expensive and few of the students actually become artists. I might sub it for an art appreciation class or something with less material costs. Then some of the science labs would go. Also very expensive. I would try to remove the labs, but not the classes. Many college sciences have lecture and not lab.

I would cut writing dead last. While creative writing would be sooner than the more formal forms like Rhetoric, writing is possibly the most important skill a person can have. No matter their career, they will write.

Answer 4

Actually... I feel that they should be MAJOR components, not just a part of...

The arts, science, math and Language too, all make for a well rounded and superior intellect... That's why Europeans, Indians and Asians are smarter than we are. Math is a key to opening music and art is a visual aesthetic for appreciating literature. It all ties in and is all copacetic.

America wastes too much money on space travel and idiotic city structures and construction and not even close to near enough on education.

Answer 5

Let me ask you this. Do you want to live in a nation of emotionally crippled people unable to think "outside the box?" Or would you rather be surrounded with witty, creative, well-rounded people?

Art education is not just about "learning to draw." (I am focusing on visual arts here because that is what I studied in college and in post-graduate work.) Through the visual arts, children learn to look at and analyze their world, as well as ogganize their thoughts and work out problems. Many children learn to deal with their emotions only through art. Art is also vital in developing a child's right brain.

By eliminating the arts from school, you give children an incredibly lopsided education. You are only showing them the analytical side of things, and not the creative, visual side. People need a well-rounded, interdisciplinary education to fully function. Without art education, we are severely limiting our childrens' development.

Answer 6

There is a growing list of empty classes in liberal arts schools. I think that the people today who are going into the Sciences and Technology realms need to have some sort of classical and artistic background. Especially in the Western World with all the tech and science jobs being outsourced, we need to develop the social skills and creativity to get ahead and say competitive.

Art brings creative thinking, that generates ingenuity and progress.

Answer 7

of course it should be permanent components of school curriculum.

science and math are important also - but the arts encourage creative and original thinking ... creative thinking is as important to the furthering of other fields as hard science!

Answer 8

Exercising both hemispheres of the brain are key to learning, understanding and interpreting. Logic and creativity are essential to human development. The arts are as worthy as science and math.

Answer 9

ok, permit me first clarify that i admire the humanities; I coach drama a speech. having suggested that we do could advance math and technology training. the US is falling way in the back of different countries interior the success rates of our toddlers in those fields. even nevertheless, I do think of that we set ourselves up for this for 2 motives. First, we are between the only countries interior the international that demands faculty little ones to attend college, a minimum of a lot of how by using severe college. maximum ecu countries and Asian countries place pupils on diverse educationl tracks at around the age of 13 consistent with their apptiutdes. So, while our pupils are in comparison with different pupils, the pupils who're finding out in math and technology are in essence math or technology majors, and ours are basically pupils of all matters. additionally, i think of we could reassess how we coach math and technology. some instructors do no longer understand why a formulation works, or why they do what they do while working a concern. They do it that way, because of the fact a instructor quicker or later in thier existence suggested it is the way it is done. Our instructors could understand the underlying concepts. while a pupil who takes a attempt gets the respond suited and shows their paintings, yet gets a failing grade because of the fact the pupil understood the subject extra suitable than the instructor, there's a concern. this does not in basic terms harm the mathematical genius, besides the indisputable fact that it additionally hurts the mathematically impaired, as i'm. I had instructors that in the time of basic terms defined that it is done a definite way, on account it is the way it is done. I never truly knew what i replaced into doing and that i had little or no know-how of tangible international utility. Then finally, I have been given a instructor who defined why we did what we did while working a concern. Math finally made experience to me, yet in all my years in college, and that i'm in grad college, that replaced into the only instructor who taught math that way. so we are able to show math and technology until eventually we turn blue, it may no longer substitute the result by offering lots math and technology different worth concern aspects, such because of the fact the humanities gets pushed aside. Math and technology rankings will in basic terms advance as quickly as we modify our attitude to the matters.

Answer 10

science and math suck!!!!!!!!!!