2006-10-10 02:53:51 · 24 answers · asked by progolfer1981 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
This would be a truly grave decision for everyone involved.
2006-10-10 03:40:01 · answer #1 · answered by woodc1981 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
A force response would be the dumbest thing to do as it would only prove North Korea's point. US already got involved in Korean business when South seceded from the North and then threatened the North with nukes.
The North's argument for building a nuke is just that: responding to the US threat. If that threat materializes, then many more countries would begin to actively seek nukes and fast.
2006-10-10 04:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by elven_rangers 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In October 1950, China entered the Korea war and kicked our butts. They dared us to drop the atomic bombs on them. They knew their population was so large that for us to be able to put a dent in it would have caused so much atomic energy to have been expended the world as we knew it would have ceased to exist. Well, they have even more people now; we would have a hard time using nukes on North Korea, as due to their proximity to South Koreas we would be killing an ally. The North Koreas rolled over the South in 1950 but would have a harder time this time but would prevail. Japan has a non-aggression Constitution but I believe they would have to come to the aid of the South. If not and the North wins and eventually rolling over Japan. I don't think American could stop them this time, too much political correctness plus bog brother China. No, North Korea would not be someone anyone should wake up!
No, only kids, literates and that bunch of professional losers believe that garbage of aggression. Have you ever wondered why China is everyone friend and why everyone in a political situation listens to them and takes their advise?
2006-10-10 03:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, did you watch that video that talked about what a war with North Korea would be like? They would swarm the south and destroy all positions. The last time it was a stale mate but
according to generals of the U.S they are capable of pushing the U.S out even if all the patiots say "LETS JUST NUKE EM" because thats exactly what they were expecting the last time.
And I don't think China would be too happy either.
2006-10-10 03:31:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The United states should not, no. We should support sanctions but not send millions of troops. We would however be involved since we have lots and lots of troops stationed in south korea. China however is an ally of N. Korea but they do NOT support them having nukes and were very disapointed that they tested without 6 party talks. I think the world should get involved. Nukes in the hands of jong is a bad idea.
2006-10-10 03:02:50 · answer #5 · answered by APBT lover 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
4 things to consider before a country is invaded. #1. a country should always be invaded with the consensus & participation of at least 4 leading world powers unless the aforementioned country attacks first. #2. a leader must be chosen to replace the one to be dethrowoned prior to invasion. #3. a plan A & B must be in place prior to invasion (e.g. exit stragedy). #4. alternative measures should be first applied (economic sanctions) for obvious military reasons.
2006-10-10 03:18:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The US shouldn't react on their own when it comes to North Korea. It's an issue that should be resolved by international cooperation, via diplomacy.
2006-10-10 03:04:39 · answer #7 · answered by pookie 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The poor Korean bast@d tried to talk with W for years. Diplomacy isn't something the US does anymore. What's happened to us? We make threats and reject diplomacy then when we're confronted with an escalation, we're screwed. If we had better foriegn policy we wouldn't have to be so worried about terrorism and other countries feeling like they need to arm themselves to balance out the threat the US makes.
2006-10-10 03:14:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think any issue should try to be resolved diplomatically without force but if it is truly necessary then I am in agreement to the use of force. right now though we are tied up in Iraq and Afghanistan so our options are limited.
2006-10-10 02:59:47 · answer #9 · answered by Nuthouse 4456 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Thank God our hands are tied or W and his Axis of Evil that started the whole thing would be sending in the troops and Pis*sing everone else off! At least in the Middle east we had a threat, but how many North Korean Terriorist do you know that are living in America? 0
2006-10-10 02:58:45 · answer #10 · answered by Michael 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋