It's not about Iran or N.korea. I don't understand that in current scenario, how can we deprive any country including Iran, N.Korea from nuclear technology. I know that political situation and aggressive history of these countries point in other direction. They have a bad record and we have proofs that Iran has been in volved with terroerist organizations like hezbollah. But what makes these countries a strong contender for Nuclear technology is U.S's attitude. I know its a false notion that these countries are doing it for civilian purposes, but from recent history of world events, it's clear that no country is safe. U.S or I should better say Bush, is trying to achieve personal interests by misusing his power. Today they are negotiating with Iran and N.korea, but tell me, would UN interfere if BUSH attacks Iran or N.Korea. And even if UN interferes, does it holds the power to stop US. we already have seen this in the gulf war. I am not saying IRAN or N.Korea are saints, but U.S's attitude and U.N's lack of integrity is causing a huge sense of insecurity in the world. And I think only way to be secure is to become a nuclear power. Any country would think twice to attack a nuclear nation. I think its not creating insecurity but a sense of international security. I think what India did is appreciable, India has promised that it won't be the first to use nuclear warfare, but would reply back as now it has the power. I don't think a statement like that increases tension in the atmosphere, but it surely gives India a sense of security!!!
2006-10-12 12:28:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by ankit mohan s 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
China has certain our nationwide secure practices because of the fact it now owns and controls america of a and government by using debt. China has certain its pastimes and possession of the U.S. would be secure against 2009 on out! Iran, North Korea or the different us of a which incorporates the Soviet Union understand extra suitable than to fol with the Communist "pink" chinese language government who's military totals over one hundred twenty million reliable in the present day and are completely nuclear armed and able to destroying any us of a silly sufficient to clutter with it because of the fact it offered the country! That replaced into the final bastion of liberty and freedom unto the international and now owing to the U.S. Congress, unfair commerce bargains that despatched the U.S. commercial and production base unfold in the time of different aspects of the globe....individuals are unemployed, financially bankrupt, void of any actual management that has the yank citizen at heart and destiny generations of individuals would be born into economic slavery on the mercy of people who carry the worlds wealth! positioned undeniable & basic usa can not financially have sufficient money to look after itself, it opted to look after the international quite and now could be paying the actual fee......finished and entire financial ruin with a nationwide Debt this us of a can never pay off.
2016-10-16 00:59:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by kigar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
isnt it odd that they spend so much on destruction when so many are starving
the money they put in one of these bombs could feed a nation , yet they continue to let people die
if they could put the money where it was needed , and food and shelter was given to those who need it .. i feel there would not be as much hate in this world and their bombs would be no longer needed anyway
it is very sad indeed xx
this is a global problem and every country is doing the same xx
2006-10-10 01:58:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Peace 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well u know what surprises me -- ALL these countries not only what you mentioned -- have spent so much of money in Nuclear weaponry, if they would have spent that money on education -- there would be no poverty, illetracy and unemployment. people still havent learnt it from nuclear destruction in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and "Orange" in Vietnam. i just saw pictures of how the people even today are subjected due to the "ORANGE" they sprinkled during Vietnam war, genetic dieseases due to radioactivity is still prevalent in mass amounts. what surprises me is that people have IGNORED events like -- Chernobyl and Bhopal Gas Tragedy.
these Nuclear catastrophes are going to doom our beautiful earth one day.
on the contrary, well isnt ur country involved too?.
2006-10-13 21:40:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by marissa 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To some people,power is more important than anything else,including the suffering of millions of people.Why they wanted to make something fatal for the whole world,I'll never know.Men in high places are just too busy climbing higher to look at the broken bodies at their feet.I cry for the world's children.
2006-10-10 02:04:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by kimberli 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they believe this will bring them power and 'safety'. The power of threatening mass violence and the safety of retaliation. In reality, it does the opposite. It removes power by world condemnation and it removes safety by having your labs, factories and launch facilities targetted by all other world nuclear powers.
2006-10-10 02:00:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by sparkletina 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, they could have utilised the money better to educate ppl like you so you could present a coherent thought!
2006-10-10 02:21:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by suresh t 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The USA has 10,000 nuclear missles. Korea can't have one to protect itself?
2006-10-10 01:57:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I agree the money should have been spent on food for his people
2006-10-10 21:19:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by ausblue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they 2 stupid!
2006-10-10 02:07:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by josephine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋