Has anyone completed a cost-benefit analysis of the two options?
2006-10-10 00:51:10 · 10 answers · asked by S h ä r k G û m b ò 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
You're so funny! But, really that depends on the boyfriend. Does he have anything to offer, that the vibrator doesn't? And if so, does it out weigh the cost of the batteries? Would you take the vibrator to meet your parents? Mom, Dad, this is Bob(battery operated boyfriend!) How funny would that be? Could you see this at a family reunion? OMG! The possibilities are endless! You're gonna have to let us know the results of your analysis!
2006-10-10 01:01:00 · answer #1 · answered by rebecca_sld 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say that Boyfriends in the long run would be cheaper ... this would be die to the fact that you will constantly be getting back from him, and if he is a decent boyfriend - more than you spend on him ...
But if I was you ... I would keep the battery Operated version next to your bed just in case.
2006-10-10 07:56:25 · answer #2 · answered by masteroflisa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vibrators, for sure.
Vibrators don't need food, birthday presents, beer, dates. (But they'd probably appreciate being taken to a good movie once in a while, just to show they're cared about, you know?)
2006-10-10 07:54:07 · answer #3 · answered by shortcake 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Boyfriends don't need batteries, their 2 special power cells regenerate quite quickly over time
2006-10-10 07:58:06 · answer #4 · answered by Sheriff Leane 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vibrators don't mow the lawn, take out the trash, or buy you girls gifts to get what you've got.
2006-10-10 08:04:23 · answer #5 · answered by randyken 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A vibrator does not have a wallet, you would be lost
2006-10-10 07:54:01 · answer #6 · answered by Captain Comment 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Has a vibrator ever bought you dinner?
2006-10-10 07:52:29 · answer #7 · answered by Holden 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
give me the vibrator
2006-10-10 08:00:18 · answer #8 · answered by Tiffany b 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
of course its the BF... LOL... how tough it can be..
2006-10-10 08:39:11 · answer #9 · answered by direct2leo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, why not have both?
2006-10-10 07:54:00 · answer #10 · answered by trouble421muah 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋