because that's all they were taught; to treat the symptom. i got that answer straight from my MD. as long as they have everyone dependent on one pill a day, the pharmaceutical companies have a full pocket. that's why i went alternative.
2006-10-10 10:26:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by sweetiethatcares 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If no consensus on the optimal management exists and practices vary greatly worldwide.
Possible explanations include difficulties in developing agreed diagnostic protocols and the coexistence of ilness, nociceptive and, occasionally, idiopathic simptoms can find in the same patient.
Symptoms has historically been classified according to its etiology without regard for the presumed mechanism(s) underlying the specific symptoms.
A combined etiologic/mechanistic classification might improve ilness management.
The treatment is largely empirical, often relying heavily on data from small, generally poorly-designed clinical trials or anecdotal evidence.
Consequently, diverse treatments are used, including non-invasive drug therapies, invasive therapies, and alternative therapies (e.g., acupuncture).
Terms:
Age Factors
Aged
Complications
Diagnosis*
Disorders/diagnosis*
Sex: Female/Male
Geriatric Assessment*
Hospitalization*
Humans
Interview, (ex.Psychological)
Observer Variation
Status Rating Scales
What is a cause versus a symptom?
Let’s take the example of someone who visits the doctor for a persistent headache. If the doctor just prescribes aspirin, he is treating the symptom. If he does additional research and uncovers a more serious condition, then he would apply a different tactic to treat the cause of the headache.
Predictive analytics can be utilized to uncover root cause issues for medical so they can treat the problem, not just the symptoms.
There are also statistical techniques that can help you uncover the root cause issues. Instead of just fixing symptoms, you'll be able to directly execute against root cause issues to fix a problem and its key contributing factors.
Participant level of understanding; program can intended for participants with a basic or intermediate level of understanding of the topic.
2006-10-09 23:48:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ruzica A 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the situation. Sometimes you can't really treat the cause...for example, two kids were playing dodgeball when one fell on an axe. What should the doctor do, teach the kid how to play dodgeball well, or fix the wound? Other times the cause is treated. If a kid has bruises because he's abused, the doctor can call social services or whatever. But really all the medical doctor is concerned with is what *they* can do. When it comes to diseases, the actual problem of the disease is the problems it causes--the symptoms--and that's what the doctor can treat. Sometimes the doctor can give antibiotics or a vaccine to help, but it really depends on the situation.
2006-10-09 20:31:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by eds_poofed_hair 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It does seem that way, doesn't it. Most doctors look into the symptoms of a condition such as fever, coughing, hardness of breath, and so on. But the doctor can't immediately tell the cause of these symptoms. So he treats the symptoms to somewhat relieve the discomfort of the patient, but at the same time takes all symptoms into account to see what the cause of the symptoms (the actual sickness) is. Depends on the experience of the doctor, the diagnosis may take several minutes to several days.
2006-10-09 20:37:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Redhawkphl 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
We must first find the real cause of a germ condition before you can figure out how to treat it without killing the patient or giving bad side effects. But it much better from a financial point of view to treat something that is ongoing and thus needs more medication than it is to find a cure that will stop it. That's only one shot deal.
2006-10-09 23:32:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by dongeraldd 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Medical doctors DONT always treat the symptoms only. They do work to diagnose the underlying cause of the condition.
I dont know how you got this idea but please do not go by some hearsay or some stray examples.
2006-10-10 03:35:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by S U P R A M 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think ur wroung. When ever patient comes to doctor with symptoms, he firstly try to find out cause of it and start treating that cause.
symptomatic treat ment is given only when there is no treatment available for that disease or cause of those symptoms can not be found
2006-10-10 04:28:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by dr sachpw 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because there is alot of money in pharmacy. Doctors get a big kick-back for perscriptions. Treating the underlying cause fall to the natural doctors that don't use drugs to heal.
I'm thinking you are referring to a disease rather than an accident.
2006-10-09 20:36:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Living the Alaskan life 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
because most patients see a doctor after the cause.
2006-10-09 20:47:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by used1goods 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are talking about allopathy docs then its because this line of medicine has this line of thought.The patients who approach these docs are obviously looking for quick reliefs from the painful symptoms.The holistic heeling would take longer time.
2006-10-09 20:49:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋