Y ISI is to be blame for every mishap in India?

Question

"India is Blaming ISI for everything even every Child which is born in India is also bcoz of ISI"

It seems india has no security, no intelligence, no secret service.

Answer 1

Mr Buttox,

Who else? i'll tell you who else.

This could be done by any fighter from kashmir who are fighting for their freedom there, Where India Army is slaughtering 100's of 1000's kashmisries every day. That could also be the reaction of 100's of 1000's houses burned, so many women raped and burn alive, so many childred killed, in kashmir. Y every body is kept Quite for them, they are not human being's? They don't have families, kids? Kashmir is burning and flames are flying every where.

Every time India is saying ISI is involved but they are unable to proof it, they are unable to provide evidence y?
bcoz its not the truth? and they don't have any evidence.

Indian intelligence? They have many wings, some of them are specially formulate only for Pakistan.
Now i don't know what these Specialy wings are working on,

may task is given to then to murdered our high cammands, make terriorts activity, bomb blast, shiite sunni riots. and recently Blochistan riots...etc.so they don't h,ve enough time to watch ISI activities in India rite?

Y every body is crying for JUST 186 people in mumbai train blast and few more small small incedents?

Yes Mr. Ankush, thats all over internal matter non of India's Business,
by the way same is happening there in India also, i don't wanna mentioned that here u know better.

Answer 2

ISI is not a very new intelligence organisation.Its an age old. Take case of Kargil,Kashmir,Khalistan(Punjab), Mumbai1993 blasts,Delhi Explosion every time ISI has a key role in these things. India has proof document of present Mumbai blasts also.
Stop favouring Ur General's rule. U better know how autocracy is working at present there.
Many religious parties are opposing it.Army itself threw its PM outside.
Indian intelligence is not only watching Pakistan but other countries too.Not simply like ISI which always formulate policies keeping India as Center target.

Answer 3

Who else is to blame? The tooth fairy?

ISI did it! India probably runs it! It's very extremely unlikely that those two neighbors don't work together despite the rhetoric.

Answer 4

Well, Mr. Ali,
Look at the history of Pakistan and ISI and you will understand the thinking behind it.

Pakistan's directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, usually called the ISI, is accused of many vices.
Critics say it runs "a state within a state", subverts elected governments, supports the Taleban and is even involved in drug smuggling. Pakistan's government denies the allegations. Like many other military intelligence organisations, the shadowy ISI zealously guards its secrets and evidence against it is sketchy.
However, the agency is a central organ of Pakistan's military machine which has played a major - often dominant - role in the country's often turbulent politics.
Surveillance
The ISI was established in 1948 - as Pakistan engaged India in the first war over Kashmir - to be the top body co-ordinating the intelligence functions of its army, air force and navy.
In the 1950s, when Pakistan joined anti-communist alliances, its military services and the ISI received considerable Western support in training and equipment. The ISI's attention was focused on India, considered Pakistan's arch-enemy.
But when Ayub Khan, the army commander-in-chief, mounted the first successful coup in 1958, the ISI's domestic political activities expanded.
As a new state bringing together diverse ethnic groups within what some described as contrived borders, Pakistan faced separatist challenges - among Pashtuns, Balochis, Sindhis and Bengalis. Much of the country's early history was shaped by politicians seeking regional autonomy and the central civilian and military bureaucracies trying to consolidate national unity.
The ISI not only mounted surveillance on parties and politicians, it often infiltrated, co-opted, cajoled or coerced them into supporting the army's centralising agenda.
Defeat and disgrace
The army ran the country from 1958 to 1971, when East Pakistan broke away with Indian and Soviet help to become Bangladesh. The ISI and the Pakistani military were thoroughly discredited and marginalised after the war.
But they gained fresh purpose in 1972 when Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the new civilian leader, launched a clandestine project to build nuclear weapons. A year later military operations were launched against nationalist militants in Balochistan province.
These two events helped rehabilitate the ISI and the military. After Bhutto was ousted by General Zia ul-Haq in 1977, the Balochistan operations were ended but the nuclear programme was expanded.
The Marxist revolution in Afghanistan in the same year threatened Pakistan by opening a second "strategic front" (the first being with India to the east). The ISI was restored to its past eminence.
Secret funding
The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979 transformed the regional setting. President Carter and his national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, built a Western-Muslim coalition with Britain, France, West Germany, China, Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates playing key roles.
Revolutionary Iran offered some aid to anti-Soviet guerrillas in western Afghanistan. But all other foreign assistance to the mujahideen arrived via Pakistan, to be handled by the ISI whose Afghan Bureau co-ordinated all operational activities with the seven guerrilla militias.
This was done in such secrecy that the Pakistani military itself was kept in the dark. Just to get a sense of the scale of the operation - the CIA provided enough arms to equip a 240,000-man army, and the Saudis matched US funding dollar for dollar.
Other countries provided arms and money and Muslim countries also encouraged volunteers to join the jihad or holy war.
Mujahideen role
Foreign money helped to establish hundreds of madrassas (religious schools) in Pakistan's cities and frontier areas. These turned out thousands of Taleban (students) who joined the mujahideen in the anti-Soviet campaign.
The ISI managed this operation, handling tens of housands of tons of ordnance every year and co-ordinating the action of several hundred thousand fighters in great secrecy. Eventually, in 1988, the Soviet Union agreed to withdraw its forces by 1989, and did so.
This was seen as a great victory for the mujahideen and their patrons in Pakistan and farther a field, and a trigger for the subsequent Soviet collapse. This is why Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf feels it necessary to defend the ISI.
He has pointed out that the West backed the mujahideen, which went on to engender groups like al-Qaeda and the Taleban in the post-Soviet violence which consumed Afghanistan and brought about the US-led "war on terror".
Following the attacks of 11 September, 2001, Gen Musharraf has sought to rid the military, including the ISI, of Islamists within its ranks - a hangover from the Zia era. Elements in the military have been accused of complicity in failed attempts on his life.
Pakistani government and ISI support for militant groups who left Afghanistan to fight Indian rule in Kashmir has been the cause of much friction with India. India has repeatedly accused Pakistan, and especially the ISI, of involvement in Kashmir and in attacks elsewhere in India.