2006-10-09 18:16:20 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
You can draw parallells between all dictators. Hitler, however brought his country out of poverty, modernized it and made it a world player. Kim has done the opposite. While Hitler invaded Poland and the Low Countries and took France, Kim has a bomb he can't deliver and a country he can't defend against the submarine that is probably parked off of his coast.
2006-10-09 18:23:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Both of them have the following similarities:
- paranoid
- psychologically unstable
- huge standing armies
- dictatorship mentality
However, the reason Hitler (in my view from a strategic perspective) is more successful than Kim is namely because:
- his plans for his "Third Reich" is built upon careful planning, along with a staff of highly trained general officers;
- he listens (occassionally) to his close aides and makes reasonable sound plans;
- he knows how far to take his plans without crippling the country's economy to the point of no return.
In comparison, Kim does the exact opposite, bring his country to a state of poverty. The fact that he is an antagonist makes the current situation doubly worse for him. He's the typical spoilt child, in that he tries to get people (the international community) to accede to his demands all the time.
2006-10-09 19:07:10 · answer #2 · answered by CuriousE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no similarity , hitlers is billion times greater in all sense than kim.
1 responsible for ww2, due whish nearly 550 million deaths.
2 killed 6 million jews. who knows how many disappeared?
3 a racist, had very powerful military, desire for power, development of nation, extra love for germany, shook great britain of that time.
can kim do all this, he is nothing in front of hitler, can kim do like hitler by declaring war against usa? todays no 1 power
2006-10-09 18:53:44 · answer #3 · answered by a a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pol Pot and Kim Jong Il are/have been on the whole Buddhists. Atheists, confident, yet nevertheless non secular. Mao Zedong wasn't an evil murderer. He became in contact in a civil conflict in China, which he won. in simple terms like Lenin. Mao and Lenin, mutually as they had questionable regimes, weren't evil adult men. They did what they thought became superb for the country. till you like brutal monarchies, you're able to ought to be misinformed to not see their element.
2016-11-27 03:56:44 · answer #4 · answered by dungey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I See A Lot Of Hitler In Bush
2006-10-09 18:25:44 · answer #5 · answered by corning150 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree with Bluff Mike. I do see a big desire for power and a low self esteem in both Hitler and Kim though.
2006-10-09 18:27:54 · answer #6 · answered by a_phantoms_rose 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, Hitler at least had the VW and discouraging smoking to his credit. I don't really see ANY upside to Kim.
2006-10-09 18:19:10 · answer #7 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he is very strange too. However I think he is trying to set himself up as a major arms dealer and his "tests" are to demostrate to his buyers that he has got what they want.
Watch "Team America" for an interesting view of him !!
2006-10-09 18:40:49 · answer #8 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, no soldier of N. Korea in USA soil at all.
But USA army already at Iraq and Afghan.
Hitler, Bush and you is just same person.
2006-10-09 18:20:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but I think he has more in common with Stalin, ie starving population, etc.
2006-10-09 22:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by Richo Fev 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋