it is hard for me not to be a sarcastic person on this question as most people are on this site. but i am not like them . The translation you are looking for is "Son unas personas malcriados por su riquezas.(they are spoiled rotten due to their riches.
2006-10-09 17:17:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by lytesdelite 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
I agree "Divites delicati" translates the phrase but if you want to take things a stage further you might also consider the following..
Divites divitiis corrupti - The rich spoiled by riches
2006-10-11 08:11:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
My dictionary says that "spoiled" in this sense should be translated by the adverb nimium = too much, and some form of indulgere = to indulge, but you need a past passive participle of it and I've forgotten the endings, sorry. "dives" are "the rich". I don't recognise most of the other answers.
2006-10-10 06:13:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Corrumpo Uber
Corrumpo = Spoiled
Uber = Rich
2006-10-09 17:25:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by mindar76 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Are you looking for actual Latin (Ancient Roman), or Spanish (Spain, Mexico, South America)? Lots of people look to be answering in Spanish, not Latin.
2006-10-09 18:12:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by KdS 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Divites delicati
dives -vitis [rich, wealthy]
delicatus -a -um [soft, tender]; in bad sense, of things, [luxurious]; of persons, [spoilt, effeminate]
The verb indulgeo has no supine, so a passive participle cannot be made from it.
2006-10-10 11:29:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeannie 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Opulentae delicatum
(I am not sure of the endings...it's been a long time..double check at the site below to be extra sure..But I do know those are the WORDS you are looking for)
2006-10-10 04:44:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Logos24 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
mimar = spoiled.
Your phrase "the spoiled rich" translates to "Los mimados ricos"
But you have to say "Los ricos mimados"
2006-10-09 17:26:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by hp one 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
sapientia est minime auctoritas, est vita superstes
2016-03-28 03:21:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋