The war plan was ready
2006-10-09 13:33:23 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Political parties are merely an ILLUSION, because THIS secret and evil group has been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
Also, it's NOT about a "war on terror" or "fighting for freedoms". It's REALLY all about THIS!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-10-10 04:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's hard to say who was really to blame. I'm sure if repubs and Dem's, and even libs just sat down ant thought this through maybe the outcome would be different. When 9/11 happened I backed Bush into going to Afghanistan, we were attacked and something had to be done. Now everything has escalated with other countries. I am by no means a Bush supporter, but he did what he had to do, as far as 9/11 went. I am not a politician so I really don't understand how and why things get started. I don't hail to any political party, I vote for me, not someones agenda.
2006-10-09 14:07:31 · answer #2 · answered by aza_424 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The vote was strongly in favour of the war in the first vote because the shrub's cronies had published and sworn to the fact that Iraq had wmd and could and would use these wmd on the US. Senators and Rep's were shown documents proving that the lies were true. To get a war with Iraq the shrub lied to everyone in site about wmd and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. For that alone and the deaths that have occurred in Iraq the shrub should be impeached and imprisoned for one year for each casualty in Iraq.
2006-10-09 17:47:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's what I've been telling people. Their so-called beloved leaders have lied, yet again. Time to run the saducees and pharisees out of the temple! Clean the slate, and install new parties to power! Power to the voters, and not some stuffed collar on Capitol Hill, drinking our lifeblood like a leech! Put them all out! Good bye, Teddy Kennedy! Good Bye, John McCain! So long Dick Cheney! Get a life, Al Gore! Time to let some real change happen and start rockin' the Free World, once again!
2006-10-09 13:40:42 · answer #4 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I want to say to Hero....(yeah right), that CONGRESS voted for the war in Iraq. Are you stupid? Also, did you not see on the news that hoards of people were saying lets got to war NOW?????? Attacking our country, OUR HOME is an act of WAR. We must NOT give up, and let the terrorists RULE us! We are AMERICA! We are the greatest nation ever borne. And, btw, never trust a democrat. They go with the flow, and never stand up to their word, which is...."Huh?"
2006-10-09 13:48:52 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because the Intelligence that all the democrats in Congress had seen for the prior past 8 yrs all became a lie when it was presented to President Bush. It was almost a 100% vote to go to war. The democrat leaders in congress had seen more intel on Iraq than the President had actually seen.
2006-10-09 13:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
The libs would never blame themselves. Actually b/c Bush is the top dog right now. Don't worry, if and when a lib becomes president again and instead of allowing North Korea to have nuclear technology as they did in 1994 - we can blame them when North Korea uses that technology on us.
See, isn't it more fun to point fingers and blame than to actually take a stand and do something. Spineless libs... I see John Kerry is again doing the "I have a plan" speech but when asked what his plan was he only said "Wait and see." All they have is blame, no plan.....
2006-10-09 13:41:30 · answer #7 · answered by K_Man1998 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
the 1st few costs do not end with a decision to invade. Mny of those costs have been by making use of people who believed the lies Bush had propogated -- Bush needed to take out Iraq, and ordered team to invent evidence that he replaced into in touch in 9/11, and had WMD. UN inspectors discovered no data of lively WMD classes. It ws Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld who desperately needed conflict for no genuine reason; they invented motives. whether people who went alongside have been additionally incorrect, the optimum perpetrators -- the human beings who have been in the back of it, are people who bear often happening accountability. Uh, the guy who lies IS extra culpable than people who have faith those lies. the human beings who believed the lies have been duped by making use of the liar. unhappy, on account that many human beings found out they have been all lies, yet nevertheless, not a similar. confident, whilst they found out they have been all lies, they replaced their place -- that's what sensible human beings do in mild of latest practise. Congress ought to have listened to Shinseki, who mentioned it would take ten cases extra troops than Bush mentioned. He mentioned that only formerly Bush fired him. It replaced into Bush's conflict of selection (Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld). this is why it is his and their fault.
2016-10-19 02:50:31 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrats were a minority ,and Congress hold the purse strings so they had to appropriate the money. If you are saying Congress played a role in going to war, uh huh, yes indeedy, you betcha.!!!! It's like Truman said "the buck stops here!" so Bush led the charge and has to take the blame or credit.
2006-10-09 13:56:39 · answer #9 · answered by longroad 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because he's the figurehead. The scapegoat. Just like, if a football game is lost, they blame the quarterback, or a baseball game lost is blamed on the pitcher. Everyone loves to hate the president. Sucks. Thats why I didn't get into politics.
2006-10-09 13:36:41 · answer #10 · answered by MotherBear1975 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋