No. Accepting any form of payment is considered a full and final settlement and you surrender all rights to further litigation.
2006-10-09 07:55:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by J Somethingorother 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It depends on Nevada's laws, but what are we talking about here? Are we talking vehicle damage? If you do not sign a property damage release, you can sue, but what would you be suing for? Was the payment not full payment of your damage? If you get a bodily injury settlement, they will make you sign a release.I don't know of many insurance companies that issue checks for that without a release. There are some places though, where accepting the payment is full and final settlement and as good as a release, so check the laws in NV.
2006-10-09 10:04:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chris 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you accept a check for physical damage, you can still sue for bodily injury. If you accept a check for bodily injury, you can't sue for bodily injury any more.
So, if you accept a check, you can't sue for more, for the same thing.
2006-10-09 09:15:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you may call the motive force and the owner of the motor vehicle in a civil case. His coverage does not be in touch in this technique in any respect. coverage human beings (claims adjusters, and so forth) are not allowed interior the courtroom room in a small claims case. it quite is in basic terms you, the different motive force/proprietor of motor vehicle, and any witnesses.
2016-10-16 00:23:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YEA, IF'N YOU WORD IS NO GOOD THEN GO AHEAD AND SHOW EVERY BODY HOW YOU CAN CHANGE YOU MIND WHEN IT SUITS YOU...
2006-10-09 07:51:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋