English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

show that the following statement is false by providing a counterexample.

The expression(-a) is always less than (a).

2006-10-09 07:31:17 · 5 answers · asked by Marquesha M 1 in Education & Reference Other - Education

5 answers

lol were lerning this in skooooo

-a>a
if -a is less than a, then a is greater than -a

2006-10-09 07:35:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The counterexample is any number less than zero:

if a = -1, then (-a) = 1

2006-10-09 07:41:30 · answer #2 · answered by Computer Guy 7 · 0 0

omg!! im learning this stuff too, its rele confusing but once you get it, its easy. a counter example could be (i think, not sure) somethin like unless -a stands for a positive number and a stands for a negative number. like if -a was 4 and a was -4, then -a would be greater than a which is -4.

2006-10-09 07:41:24 · answer #3 · answered by LoLa 3 · 0 0

I think this might work...
If "a" is a negitive number like -3 then it would state - -3 which would equal a postive. therefor "a" would be equal to -3

you can put any number in though

2006-10-09 07:36:56 · answer #4 · answered by sweetandsexy2009 1 · 0 0

(-4) < 4
(-100) < 100

any negative number is alway less than the same postive number

2006-10-09 07:41:37 · answer #5 · answered by tabbaco1980 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers