hey yeah angel. I just saw the other question. what a silly thing to do. you sir lost 5 points for copying someone else's question, and we gain 2 points for asking why you would do that.
2006-10-09 16:42:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jenova 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are proper. Every guy goes to have specific tastes. I understand I can handiest talk for myself, however I decide upon a girl DOES NOT have tattoos. I shouldn't have tattoos. I love to suppose I am no longer defiling my frame with a number of nasty and cheesy tattoos. Don't get me fallacious, I do not brain a couple of tats which can be performed in well style. However, while one has them everywhere her frame like Kat Von D of LA Ink, then it's nasty and fallacious. If bikers and hardcore jail inmates suppose you have got too many tats everywhere your frame, then you definitely must assess your self. If one quits fitting black, white or some other ethnicity and turns into ink individuals then you definitely received an excessive amount of ink on her frame. If one makes a decision to get a tattoo, they fairly must suppose approximately futures. How is that tat going to seem in five, 10, 15 or extra years while one will get older? Over time, tattoos begin fading or stretching while one places on just a little weight. Do you wish to be the ancient individual with the dreaded tattoos? Also one demands to suppose approximately in which they placed the ones tattoos. A strategically located shoulder, again or leg tat is OK, however wherever else is cheesy. And under no circumstances must one placed any ink on their face! One demands to suppose approximately long run activity customers. Kat Von D could be a far prettier girl if she did not ave all the ones tats. It is a disgrace that she has defiled her frame with all that ink. For a few individuals getting tattoos can also be an dependancy. I dated one chick who received a tattoo after which an additional and an additional. Next factor you already know, she was once jogging out of areas on her frame. It was once a supply of argument among us. She would not have any of my pleas to quit. She is just too lovely for tattoos.
2016-08-29 05:35:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its a myth. I know too many tattooed women that had epidurals. They are not even necassary to have except the American birth method is flawed and by giving birth in a reclined position it actually makes it more painful because it is fighting gravity.
2006-10-09 08:52:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by h_tidewell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
An epidural is a single needle. Instead of removing blood there just giving medication. It should make any marks.
2006-10-09 06:33:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Melody M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not true.
i had 2 epidurals in my lower back..ive got a PB bunny head on my lower back
and tattoos there dont stretch...at least mine didnt!
2006-10-09 12:40:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by mommy2savannah51405 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its more difficult to give an epidural through scar tissue but its still completely possible to do it. However, the tat will probably stretch as you grow
2006-10-09 11:07:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nicole H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have one and I had two c-sections and had to get a spinal tap and it was fine. I had no problems.I don't know why there would be a problem.A tattoo is only in the skin not the spine
2006-10-09 06:32:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by loladoreen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
not a prob, there is a lil mark where i had my epidural on my tattoo, but you can't tell unless you look for it
2006-10-09 08:47:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by biffer84 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Copy people's questions???
Hey question on back tattoo for girls??
Asked by livindead_zombie13 - 5 answers - Tattoos -
You must be a very bored person to actually copy somone elses question.
2006-10-09 06:27:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by angel2005_2001 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
yeah ur cool now, cuz cool ppl absolutely do things like that... yeah get a life
2006-10-09 06:27:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by livindead_zombie13 1
·
0⤊
2⤋