I don't live in the US so maybe I'm not understanding what's going on exactly. But I was under the impression that the US prided itself on being a free country, with fewer government 'entangelments' than others. Yet the federal government has the No Child Left Behind law and I just saw a news video of how, in some cities, *mayors* are taking control of school systems. (This would be seen as a complete abuse of power here, someone acting as benevolent dictator.) The NCLB site says that the law gives "More freedom for States and communities", but it's just propaganda, isn't it? If a single person (the mayor) can decide he's in charge of the schools in 'his' city and if the federal government is restricting funds because schools aren't meeting certain standards, how is this an expression of freedom? Or does 'more freedom' mean that mayors are actually free to do this? What about the freedom for the schools? What happened to "with liberty and justice for all"? Please enlighten me!
2006-10-09
01:51:45
·
4 answers
·
asked by
glurpy
7
in
Education & Reference
➔ Other - Education
Just to give some details:
In 2000, the mayor of NYC, Michael Bloomberg, got rid of the local school boards and replaced it with a city-based department of education. He's appointed a Chancellor as head of the department. There are others who are thinking of doing something similar.
2006-10-09
02:16:00 ·
update #1