Collectively, NATO should consider military action against North Korea, instead of getting the U.N to intervene this time, like they did in 1950, NATO, not just Britain and America, should go in and stop North Korea from having a nuclear arsenal, as they can do anything they want with it, North Korea did say that they have the capabilities to make and use atomic weapons. Let's stop them before it's too late! However, I fear it may already be too late, we tried to stop them in the fifties, and the U.N refused to do anythign about it, apart from stopping the spread of communisum into South Korea.
2006-10-09 01:54:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Washington is a big and all know town and is certainly suitable deliver a holiday or just visit this city. with hotelbye you will learn more. One of many icons of Washington and the entire America may be the popular White House, the official residence of the President of the United States. Your home of every president except George Washington, it had been originally built by James Hoban in 1792, and after being burnt down by British causes in 1814 was rebuilt in 1818. Although excursions of the inside that include the East, Blue, Green, and Red Areas; the Ballroom; and the State Dining Room must certanly be reserved effectively ahead of time, every tourist to Washington may wish to see that well-known developing, at the very least from the outside. Next door to the White House would be the sophisticated 1833 Greek Revival Treasury Building and the 1871 Executive Office Building, one of the very striking previous government houses in Washington.
2016-12-23 00:04:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bombing Northern Korea would be a bad mistake. In October 1950, China entered the Korea war and kicked our butts. They dared us to drop the atomic bombs on them. They knew their population was so large that for us to be able to put a dent in it would have caused so much atomic energy to have been expended the world as we knew it would have ceased to exist. Well, they have even more people now; we would have a hard time using nukes on North Korea, as due to their proximity to South Koreas we would be killing an ally. The North Koreas rolled over the South in 1950 but would have a harder time this time but would prevail. Japan has a non-aggression Constitution but I believe they would have to come to the aid of the South. If not and the North wins and eventually rolling over Japan. I don't think American could stop them this time, too much political correctness plus bog brother China. No, North Korea would not be someone anyone should wake up!
No, only kids, literates and that bunch of professional losers believe that garbage of aggression. Have you ever wondered why China is everyone friend and why everyone in a political situation listens to them and takes their advise?
2006-10-09 02:16:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Seoul is undoubtedly South Korea's largest city and certainly one of East Asia's financial and ethnic epicentres, you are able to find more with hotelbye . Seoul is just a interesting blend of old traditions and cutting-edge electronic engineering, house to endless block food suppliers and huge nightlife districts, an extremely high-pressure instructional system and serene Buddhist temples, a trend-setting childhood lifestyle and usually crushing conformism, remarkable architecture and countless monotonous rows of grey house houses, Seoul is just a city filled with marked contrasts. Seoul is an essential element of Korea's social heritage.
2016-12-20 01:04:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I am not mistaking, the current South Korean president came to power because he promised to defend North Korea from attacks. Besides, I don't see any threat from North Korea-since the Korean war, it did not attack any country and didn't detain any chess champion for playing chess in Yugoslavia.
2006-10-09 02:22:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
dont you think that what testing the nukes has been about, North Korea are saying look at us ,you have all that military from countless nations and we have nukes ,so guess who would use there weapons first
2006-10-09 01:56:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure that option is still on the table. we just cant react too quickly.
2006-10-09 01:51:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi>
Oh not another prob.
We have enough interfering actions on our plate.
Bob
2006-10-09 02:04:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bob the Boat 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
something needs to be done;however lets not be too trigger happy.
2006-10-09 01:58:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by my_mas0n 4
·
1⤊
0⤋