2006-10-09 00:55:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
Film is better. Digital cameras have problem with "noise," color fringing, and the sensor gets dirty. You can have a 20 mp digital, but you can't count the mp on film. Digital might be more convenient and people have told me it is cheaper, but I can't see how. Conventional SLRs are less expensive than digital camera of anything near the same quality, Figure out the cost of printing pictures on your printer VS the cost of having a 24 exposure roll developed and printed at Walmart in an hour.
2006-10-09 12:15:48 · answer #1 · answered by Polyhistor 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cheap and good don't go together on digital cameras. Anything under $50 will probably only take pictures that can be displayed on a web site but give poor prints. I have seen some very good digital cameras at Costco for about $150 but expect to pay $250 and up for a high quality camera.
2016-03-28 02:29:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Problem is they keep selling photo printers. They photo paper won't last you forever (it's even been admitted by HP, Kodak, etc) and will last like 15 years maximum. So now everyone is in the craze of getting digital just for that option. They both have their advantages and disadvantages. But people are forcing the craze into digital that things come to an end. Example is that last year, because of the digital craze, Kodak no longer sells black and white paper for prints. You'll never be able to get a true black and white picture like it should be from them. Now it has to be from Fuji or another company.
2006-10-09 01:06:46 · answer #3 · answered by =Q= 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
at this point & time yes traditional film cameras has better resolution than the prints of a digital cameras. But how long it shoudnt be long soon digital cameras would outperform film cameras in terms of resolution.
2006-10-09 01:01:49 · answer #4 · answered by Dave B 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wrong traditional film camera print quality is not better than digital camera because in digital camer you can snap picture in pixels and more pixel camera more better quality and more good print so more pixel good picture.
2006-10-09 01:05:46 · answer #5 · answered by leftalone1211 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
depends on the digital cameras no. of megapixels. but sometimes the film can b better, but digital camera is cheaper in the long run
2006-10-09 01:01:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wrong
Depends on the digital camera and mega pixels and how you have them printed.
2006-10-09 01:03:29 · answer #7 · answered by danzka2001 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A digital camera is alot more convenient!
2006-10-09 01:05:09 · answer #8 · answered by Webballs 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Right!
Film is still the standard to which digitial images are compared.
Especially, when the lens must be opened for long periods of time (night pics) and when the ISO needs to be very high, 800+
2006-10-09 00:57:41 · answer #9 · answered by timc_fla 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes.A traditional film camera print quality is better than digital camera .............
2006-10-09 00:57:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋