What is your honest opinion about this?

Question

IT IS A QUESTION!!!!

ANTI-ILLEGAL ALIEN COMMERCIAL LAUNCHES IN CALIFORNIA
Ad Featuring Illegal Aliens Will Air Statewide

Los Angeles, CA ­ Art Olivier¹s campaign for governor will release their first television advertisement this 2006 election year. The ad, which highlights the illegal alien marches, debuts this Friday in Bakersfield, Santa Rosa, and the Central Valley. The advertisement, which also presents a Mexican flag raised over an upside down American flag, will roll out in the Santa Barbara, San Francisco, Sacramento, Redding, Fresno, Palm Springs, San Diego, and Los Angeles markets beginning Monday October 9th.

Art Olivier, who began campaigning back in January, has virtually been unnoticed in the mainstream media. However talk radio has embraced Olivier and his concerns regarding our open borders and the illegal invasion. Thanks to the generous donations from the listeners of talk radio, Olivier is now able to enter the television airwaves.

Although Art Olivier¹s campaign contacted all the major participants and hosts of the October 7th Gubernatorial debate, Olivier was denied an invitation. Therefore the television ad titled ³Elect Art² will offer voters an alternative position regarding illegal immigration which differs from the two main party candidates.

Kysteelgl, I like your answer...a lot.

Answer 1

I believe that this will backfire. Mexicans simply do not learn from their mistakes. Let him do it because, in the end, it will cause more animosity towards illegals.

Answer 2

Well at least it was easy ad to produce,all he had to do was search through film from local broadcasters of things that are actually happening in California. I just hope he's prepared to be called every name in the book because it's coming,he will now be branded a racist by every broadcast medium with the possible exception of talk radio,they will all make that determination before they even bother talking to him. If he is against illegal immigration as much as he seems that is of course why he can get no attention. Even though even the people of California want the illegal immigrant wave to stop the leaders are clearly on the side of the illegals,and the courts in California might as well be Mexican courts considering how they have handled challenges to laws that attempted to stem the flow of illegals. I do wish Olivier and others like him well,but as a rule I would say Cali is a lost cause,we simply waited too long,in every war you lose some battles and I'm pretty sure Cali is a loss.

Answer 3

The problem is that a vote for Art is probably lost to Schwarzenegger, not to Angelides. I might prefer this 'Art' to Schwarzenegger, but I don't know that I think he has a chance. Schwarzenegger does have dangerous tendencies towards wanting cheap labor to flood the state, and is in favor of the existing in state tuition for illegals. However, he also recently vetoed yet another attempt to give illegals drivers' licenses and vetoed outright college tuition grants to illegals last week. Angelides would have signed both.

Prop 86 is up under cover of a cigarette tax, to give illegals even more health care than they have now (if you read the fine print 45% of funds goes there.) Most voters don't even know that since many illegals smoke, and the tobacco companies in trying to kill the measure don't want to alienate the illegals.

It will be an interesting election.

Answer 4

Whatever became of the MELTING POT? Red CHina undercuts our labor force way more than our mexicans do. Ever call a telephone, cable or computer and spoken to people from India or other emerging nations who are happy to do many jobs over the information highway that our corporations seem to find a better solution. Don'tforget that anyone who's not an american citizen is an alien....

Answer 5

You know what this is stupid I live in Texas and politics are going to the garbage!!! I think that illigals are here to take care of there family and in order to do that they have to work and fo all the racial sons of a guns out there you have to remember one thing it is not just the dang MEXICANS that are the illigals here!!!! As far as the one guy saying he need a maid for cent a day grow up yu suck get up and do it yourself you lazy son of a gun!!!

Answer 6

My opinion is that I am glad I live in Florida. We don't have any one issue that has become such a huge problem that the entire Gubernatorial campaign has to be focused on it.

I also think they are morons for not letting this guy come to the debate. If he has sound ideas for fixing the current situation, he should be allowed to present them. If not, it would be like calling him out. His views on all the other issues should be brought out, too.

What, are they afraid that he's got a valid point?

Answer 7

let him show the illegal aliens on his ad it will only piss off more voters about the illegals and turn them away from those candidates harboring illegals as a good thing when it is absurd and illegals should be shipped out back to wherever they came from. come legally i dont mind but anyone who is illegal gets the boot

Answer 8

I think Id vote for him.He seems to feel the way millions of legal Americans do.Its about time someone stood up for the legal American citizen.More and more people are beginning to see the problems that millions of illegal immigrants bring along with their cheap labor.
No amnesty
Deportation not legalization

Jesi ...its news footage not hired actors,we all saw the news.

Answer 9

Here's a bit of attention for you. Hope you can actually sleep tonight.

Answer 10

i think it'll just make people even more mad at illegal immigrants, especially if they show the mexican flag over the american one. or just mad at mexicans, cuz u know how sum people think.

Answer 11

I wish people would understand that the designation "illegal" is little more than a Red Herring.

According to one provision in the immigration laws, people who show special intellectual abilities should get the red carpet treatment in gaining citizenship. My experience at the Patent Office, a Federal employer, teaches me that this is a big mistake. I rejected an Israeli patent application in 2002. It was not until this year (2006) that I learned that the inventors were millionaire owners and managers of this Israeli company. In my office action rejection, I wrote a couple of sentences that their filthy patent attorney used to attack me personally. He and another attorney teamed up to destroy my job. This was a Federal job, yet I was eventually ruthlessly punished for merely saying something the patent attorney apparently did not like to read. My boss, a Moroccan-American who had apparently gained citizenship only because of his technical ability, ordered me not to even respond to the complaining attorneys. When I still responded, I found myself in more trouble. His boss, a Chinese-American, who had been born and raised in China, fully approved of my boss’s behavior. Where was the law to protect my "right" to free speech?

Every single boss in my Tech Center at the Patent Office was born in a foreign country. There is nothing wrong with them being born in a foreign country, but the discrimination against American born people by this Federal Agency is clear. And the absence of free speech at the Patent Office is likewise clear. When we place an overarching emphasis on intellectual ability, we put all our eggs in one basket—forsaking other desirable qualities, such as an appreciation for what I, as well as a handful of other Americans, consider precious values.

Let's consider one of these values: the work ethic. People who are here illegally do not live on the welfare rolls. They work hard. Those folks who work hard picking fruits and vegetables, if granted citizenship, are guaranteed to stay off the welfare rolls and, instead, to contribute to our economy. And they will pass this attitude down from generation to generation.

Many of the folks who work at the Patent Office, whether they are legal immigrants or American born, are downright lazy. They do the minimum amount of work, which is quite monotonous, to get by. An employee could actually be penalized, as I was, for working too hard.

If given a good education, many of the people who are here illegally would show that they have great intellectual abiliity. We would be much better off giving these people, who have demonstrated that they hold values that are important for America, the Red Carpet treatment toward citizenship than we are giving just any foreign born people such priority only based on intellectual ability.

Now consider H-1B visas. The best way for a smart American person to get a job in computer programming is to become an Indian citizen, apply for an H-1B visa, and work at a meager wage. Microsoft loves the H-1B visa because it never has to pay an American computer programmer a dime. It’s easy for billionaires like Gates to hire slave labor from abroad using the H-1B visa. And, guess what. It’s all legal, so it must be good, right? It’s a terrific way to legally take jobs away from smart Americans.

Now consider trying to assert your “legal rights” in court. This year I found myself, for the first time in my life, being wrongfully evicted. The lawyers of the rich landlord repeatedly lied. It took four months of unjust hardship before they finally dismissed their case with prejudice. I have been countersuing them because I know that they violated several of my “legal rights.” For whatever reason, no lawyer ever wanted to represent me, so I found myself, as a pro se litigant, facing what is now the third attorney, who is also an extraordinarily ruthless individual. He has lied so many times, and threatened me so many times, that I cannot keep up with what I view as his misdeeds. Can I punish him for his lies and for his refusal to provide me with evidence that I had requested—evidence that I have a “right” to obtain? Of course not. He knows that the law really does fully sanction his lies.

There is no way to defeat this attorney. He knows the system well because he has had his license for the past 26 years. He is the master of ad hominem attacks and Red Herrings. He knows exactly how and when to lie, as well as how to make me believe that he has succeeded in making me look bad as a person.

Unless and until one finds oneself up against a ruthless attorney, one could never understand that the designation “illegal” is little more than a Red Herring.

Our Govenment routinely uses the designations "legal" and "illegal" as Red Herrings to justify all sorts of barbaric policies. Our Government mindlessly and heartlessly allows children in foreign countries to be bombed and tormented—all in the name of Red Herrings, such as, “They have a right to defend themselves,” “They have a right to exist,” “He murdered his own people,” “They have weapons of mass destruction,” “We must fight terrorism,” and “They invaded a sovereign country.” For each of these examples, we can see that the designations "legal" and "llegal" are used to justify the barbaric acts.

In summary, the designation "illegal", in the issue of illegal immigration, is little more than a Red Herring.