What are our options? We really don't have any dialogue with North Korea and economic sanctions just hurt the people that are trapped by their government. We could take him out and remove some of the pressure on our troops in Iraq. At least this time Bush would have an excuse with regard to weapons of mass destruction.
2006-10-09 00:38:48 · 9 answers · asked by tadpoleslider 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
In October 1950, China entered the Korea war and kicked our butts. They dared us to drop the atomic bombs on them. They knew their population was so large that for us to be able to put a dent in it would have caused so much atomic energy to have been expended the world as we knew it would have ceased to exist. Well, they have even more people now; we would have a hard time using nukes on North Korea, as due to their proximity to South Koreas we would be killing an ally. The North Koreas rolled over the South in 1950 but would have a harder time this time but would prevail. Japan has a non-aggression Constitution but I believe they would have to come to the aid of the South. If not and the North wins and eventually rolling over Japan. I don't think American could stop them this time, too much political correctness plus bog brother China. No, North Korea would not be someone anyone should wake up!
2006-10-09 00:41:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of the observe would desire to be 'hypercritical' yet truly a 'closed' communist united states like North Korea , with their new chief , desirous to teach his muscle , would desire to be a severe project to non violent neighbours which includes South Korea. If this 'close society' would not have faith in international family on the international point , they might desire to a minimum of be demanded to attend a United international locations emergency assembly to respond to questions. explanation why some mature , democratic and non violent international locations have their own nuclear deterents is in basic terms for that - to deter rogue states which includes NK from putting a nuclear armed weapon into yet another united states for no obvious reason. the international is staring on the Communist State very heavily.
2016-10-02 02:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by shimp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US know they work, and how to make them - no need to test.
The US government should spend more time looking after the affairs of their own people rather than trying to dictate to other countries. Just because another country is run differently, or has different views, does not make them wrong.
2006-10-09 00:45:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
from reading these questions and answers, I am starting to understand how bush won a second term...let the rest of the world deal with this one, they have the capability, let us pull the stance we did at the beginning of wwII and f'ing stay out of it for once...until it effects us.
2006-10-09 00:42:51 · answer #4 · answered by ninja cat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Change "over" to "on the capital city of", and you have my vote. Bluffing hasn't worked with these guys. Realise it's either us or them. Face it, it's them.
2006-10-09 01:26:31 · answer #5 · answered by tzeentchau 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think US will test any new nuclear
2006-10-09 00:41:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think they should because it will start a conflict and there we are back at war again.
2006-10-09 00:57:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you bet! go to bed with the devil, wake up in hell
2006-10-09 00:42:39 · answer #8 · answered by St♥rmy Skye 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
invasion will be enough
2006-10-09 00:43:10 · answer #9 · answered by Peiper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋