citizenship?

Question

hi, i have a question on the classifications of us citizenship.. what's the difference between the citizenship at birth and the citizenship from immigration? do they hold different rights? what if the person was born aboard to us parents, does he/she have the same right as an us born citizen? how about us citizen born abroad and the ones get the citizenship from immigration?

okay thanks for all the answers so far.. how about this.. the person born aboard to us citizens is a us citizen at birth.. does he or she consider as naturalized us citizen or natural born citizen? does natural born citizen means the person born in the united states soil ONLY?

Answer 1

Ok, some of you are right, some are a little misinformed. Here's the skinny on citizenship. A person born in the U.S. is automatically a U.S. citizen, unfortunately no matter where your parents are from--hence the big debate on babies of illegal immigrants becoming auto citizens.
A baby born outside the U.S. to U.S. citizen parents is automatically a citizen. All the parents need to do is show proof of citizenship, and their child's birth certificate, and their child will be recognized as a U.S. citizen. This is for instances of say, children of U.S. military members who are born overseas. No reason why that person couldn't go on to become President, either. Both parents were citizens, they're a citizen by birth.
A person who gains citizenship by immigration becomes a Naturalized citizen. Those are the ones who can't become president, like Arnold Swarzenegger, as the person above me said. They can still hold govt. office, like congress or senate, just not the head cheese job of President.
Naturalized citizens receive a Certificate of Naturalization after everything is said and done, they pass all their tests, interviews, and attend their Naturalization Oath Ceremony.
Children of U.S. citizen parents who are born overseas receive a Certificate of Citizenship if the parents really want one to prove their child is a citizen by birth.
The only difference in the rights of U.S. born children and the rights of citizens by Naturalization is the right to become president. Everything else is the same.

Answer 2

I don't agree with Ashok.

No, citizenship at birth and citizenship from immigration (naturalization) hold the same rights. One is not better than the other. Both are as much an American citizen as the other. A US citizen born abroad is the same as a US citizen born in the USA or naturalized (from immigration). All are equal and all have the same rights. The only difference may be how prejudiced citizens feel with their own opinions, but by law, all are the same and equal.

I stand corrected as far as what Chuck here said: A naturalized citizen can never be President. Oh well, eh?

Answer 3

If you are born abroad to US citizens, you are a citizen by birthright

The only defined right that naturalized citizens lack is defined in Article 4 of the Constitution:

"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States."

Should this change? Possibly. It does save us from Arnold (The Governator) Swarzenegger as a candidate from President.

Answer 4

The only difference: In order to be President of the United States, you must be born in the US. A naturalized citizen, such as Henry Kissinger, cannot become President, even if he is in the line of succession (the line of people eligible to be come president, if the sitting president suddenly dies).
A child born to parents outside of the US becomes a US citizen, but cannot become President (unless it comes up and the Constitution is challenged on this point).

Answer 5

They are supposed to have the same rights, but the society today does not consider that since USA was originally made up of Immigrants only.

Those old immigrants families consider them selves to be true Americans and those new ones who get citizenship from immigration are classified as 2nd class citizens

Answer 6

it is inaccurate, in the event that they don't stick to the immigration regulations how can we anticipate to have them stick to the different regulations? unlawful is illegitimate era and should not be rewarded exceptionally while there are human beings in international places around the area waiting years on lists to get into our u . s . a . the criminal way. Giving citizenship will purely motivate extra unlawful immigrants. the superb element you're able to do is touch your congressman and senator and voice your opinion. the worry is in simple terms too many human beings sit down lower back and whinge approximately it yet do not do something effective to make their voice heard. mutually as the illegals take to the streets in protests.