2006-10-08 18:50:53 · 12 answers · asked by juju 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
mixed bag-that is why they call it cast away-some yes and some no-married women dont belong there to begun with-david in Jesus amazing grace
2006-10-10 05:57:27 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it had been years,and she had to move on. I think she thought about it, and wanted to, but in the end her immediate life won over, she had a husband who loved her and a baby. I felt sad at that part, I really wanted her to go back to him.......but I knew why did chose the way she did.
2006-10-08 18:53:20 · answer #2 · answered by simone 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, that's what makes her such a great woman. she knows it would never work out. she continued her life and started a family. for her to leave them would make her irresponsible, disloyal and thus, undesirable. kind of like the end of the Graduate when they get on the bus and ride off. there's all this awkwardness and the magic is gone.
2006-10-08 18:57:10 · answer #3 · answered by bella 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
4 years- it suggested so. After he knocked his teeth out (which, it is going without, is very manly), a sparkling scene opens with a fish he's quickly to spear, and the textual content "4 Years Later" seems. tell your acquaintances that you own them and the lives of their first-born
2016-12-04 10:33:12 · answer #4 · answered by mundell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no cuz she had a new husband and 2 kids. but what was the point at the end of the movie? i didn't get that part or was that the beginning? anyway no she shouldn't.
2006-10-08 18:52:57 · answer #5 · answered by glyph06 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hah i just watched that movie!!
and i was thinking the SAME exact thing!
i was trying to put myself in her position and think about what i would do.
well i was thinking that she had her new husband, kids, and her new life already. and she can not just abandon all of that.
so i do not think she should have taken him back.
she thought he was dead, and now she has her new life to live.
2006-10-08 19:01:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that she should have taken him back because what she did to him was very cruel.
2006-10-09 09:51:42 · answer #7 · answered by Ketty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. If she had, that would have meant that she sat around pining and waiting. She'd have been a f-ing idiot.
2006-10-08 18:53:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no cuz she is already married, plus it wont be fair to her kids and her hubby.
2006-10-08 18:55:29 · answer #9 · answered by Dave 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not taking him back makes it better
2006-10-08 18:51:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋