English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Also, how will people know how to invest their money? School Debate... need to know!

2006-10-08 17:25:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Insurance

8 answers

In 1936, the federal government published an informational pamphlet on Social Security. It stated:

"…and finally, beginning in 1949, 12 years from now, you and your employer will each pay 3 cents on each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. That is the most you will ever pay."

http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/ssb36.html
--------
Social Security is a multi-trillion dollar lie.

People will know how to invest their money because when left alone by politicians they always find a way, and it is almost always better. People learn how to drive. People learn algebra. People learn how to use computers and the Internet. Why would anyone assume that people are too stupid to learn how to invest their own money. Is it not arrogant to assume they need their hand held all their life by the government.
-
Young people today will receive a return on the SS investment of 1.5% or less. Simply look up the CD rates at the banks and credit unions in the area. I can get a CD with a rate of return of 5% right now. In your debate ask your opponent to explain how 1.5% is better than 5%.
-

2006-10-08 18:05:45 · answer #1 · answered by Zak 5 · 0 0

Yes, it will take away from SSI, somewhat. But look at it this way - SSI is basically a great, big, Ponzi Scheme (look it up) and is doomed to collapse eventually.

We need to be teaching our kids a lot more about money, investing, and finance, when they are in school - basic economics! How things work, and WHY government creates more problems (in the long run) than it solves.

Kids need to learn about spreading the risk with mutual funds, how to read a balance sheet (hey, how many of you ADULTS know how to do that??) and how to let their money make money for THEM. Social Security is just about the absolute WORST return on your money you can get - besides a cookie jar under your bed.

2006-10-09 04:02:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 0 0

Keep in mind that the original proposal to privatize SSI was merely to add the OPTION for folks that wanted to control a portion of their SSI money. Folks would not be forced to control their SSI...it would merely be an option for a portion of their money.

I hate that "how will folks know how to invest their money" question they asked you. To think that the government can do a better job with my money than I can is crazy. Why stop at SSI? What makes anybody think the government is so good with managing money? They've got a terrible track record.

Where to invest? I suspect their would be a selection of mutual funds similar to a 401(k) or the government employee thrift savings plan.

2006-10-09 01:54:52 · answer #3 · answered by derek 4 · 0 0

I have no moral obligation to people on SSI..

I can say with certainty that the money I am forced to pay into social security would give a better return if I had it in a typical high yield savings account.. AT THE LEAST! I'd even take 10 year government bonds!! 4.5% beats social security! simply because we all don't want to live to 80 or 90 or 100 years of age...

2006-10-08 17:34:54 · answer #4 · answered by kvuo 4 · 1 0

the choice to denationalise Social secure practices will not be on the table very long. It replaced into an selection decrease back in the overdue 90s and early 2000s yet not anymore. What they have been going to do replaced into section out the share of money that went in the direction of Social secure practices and something might circulate right into a private account. Social secure practices replaced into accumulating extra money than they necessary to conceal the retiring seniors, so they didn't want all of it. by making use of doing this, they might have diminished the quantity of advantages that human beings might carry together from Social secure practices and make it much less annoying to section it out extra sooner or later. they did not try this however and quickly the toddler Boomers would be in retirement. as quickly as they retire, the Social secure practices fund will finally circulate unfavorable, using fact there is only not sufficient suckers to assist the equipment.

2016-10-19 01:40:26 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, what happens when people invest their life savings poorly?

By the way, there are people who collect more from Social Security than the money they put in: people who are totally disabled as young workers, people who earn minimum salaries below the SS benefit threshholds, etc.

2006-10-09 01:49:25 · answer #6 · answered by fcas80 7 · 0 1

to keep it simple, you would have to follow some specific guidelines, but you can get a better return at least theoretically then letting the government invest this.

2006-10-09 13:41:46 · answer #7 · answered by tigertiggerii 3 · 0 0

I have no clue!

2006-10-09 12:25:06 · answer #8 · answered by Britta 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers