Of course more died today. When will it all end?
2006-10-08 13:39:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Not yet as it is just turning morning, which is usually when the deaths start!
For the past 2 days though!
07-Oct-2006 2 | US: 2 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Mosul - Ninawa Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Baghdad (northwest of) Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
06-Oct-2006 5 | US: 4 | UK: 0 | Other: 1
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Bayji (near) - Salah ad Din Hostile - hostile fire
DK Martin Hjort Basra - Basrah Hostile - hostile fire
Even Rice is saying now the we have done all we can and it is out of control. Now it's time to get the troops out before the election! I added the election part, but that is what she meant!
In the last week there has been more than 19!
04-Oct-2006 6 | US: 6 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US Corporal Benjamin S. Rosales Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US Lance Corporal Edward M. Garvin Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Specialist Timothy Burke Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Private 1st Class Dean Bright Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
03-Oct-2006 3 | US: 3 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US George Obourn Jr. Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire
US Staff Sergeant Jonathan Rojas Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Staff Sergeant Daniel Isshak Tikrit - Salah ad Din Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
02-Oct-2006 9 | US: 8 | UK: 1 | Other: 0
US Joseph W. Perry Muhallah - Babil Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Private 1st Class Michael K. Oremus Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Specialist Justin R. Jarrett Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Staff Sergeant James D. Ellis Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Specialist Raymond S. Armijo Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Specialist Kristofer C. Walker Taji - Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Private 1st Class Satieon V. Greenlee Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Staff Sergeant Joe A. Narvaez Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
UK Lance Corporal Dennis Brady Basra - Basrah Hostile - hostile fire - mortar attack
01-Oct-2006 7 | US: 7 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US Sergeant Denise A. Lannaman Arifjan, Kuwait Not reported yet
US Sergeant Mario Nelson Hit - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - RPG attack
US NAME NOT RELEASED YET Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US Corporal Chase A. Haag Baghdad (west of) Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Captain Justin D. Peterson Al Anbar Province Non-hostile - vehicle accident
US Lance Corporal Christopher B. Cosgrove III Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US Corporal Aaron L. Seal Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
Total 32 | US: 30 | UK: 1 | Other: 1
2006-10-08 13:43:32 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did you also know that when our troops die after being severely injured in Iraq, they are not reported or counted as those soldiers who die instantly while fighting insurgents. I also learned that about 20,000 USA soldiers got injured badly and about 2,300 of them have died. Our government only admits that 2,739 soldiers have died since the invasion, ignoring the other 2,300 who died due to their injuries.
2006-10-08 14:15:49 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Stephanopoulos has his weekly Sunday morning show. At the end he tells how many soldiers died in Iraq during the week. Usually there is three or four; today there were nineteen. That is almost quadruple of what it usually is. I think that is telling us something.
2006-10-08 13:44:32 · answer #3 · answered by pixles 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry bud, yet Bush is not any longer a factor in this equation. And if i could have faith the information media, those 5 adult males have been killed by one in all our very own! unhappy situation to be certain, yet i do no longer see how every person can blame Bush for this, or Obama the two for that remember!
2016-12-26 13:05:57 · answer #4 · answered by dobard 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More young men dying for oil, gold and money and power. Sad isn't it? Maybe if our school system wasn't made to fill our minds with so much bs, more people would see the truth. But instead they give the kids algebra and lie to them about the root causes of war. Pathetic.
2006-10-09 06:07:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mark Bingham 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly they did. It will only end when the American people stop supporting it. So far we haven't...no matter what the polls are saying.
There are still too many people in this country who are committed to this wayward adventure.
2006-10-08 13:43:31 · answer #6 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a war based on George Bush's lies, he is a shame, I would like to send his two daughters over there and see how much he likes war then.
2006-10-08 13:46:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yep, Freedom's on the march doncha know
2006-10-08 13:42:46 · answer #8 · answered by Mike Honcho 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Convert to Islam.....or die.
The only other option is to fight.
Which one do you prefer?
2006-10-08 13:42:56 · answer #9 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
EVERY DAY PEOPLE DIE BUT THE GOVERNMENT DON'T WANT TO ADMIT IT
2006-10-08 13:40:37 · answer #10 · answered by chuco 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋