.
ALL THE FOSSILS ON DISPLAY IN THE CREATION MUSEUM: You can examine the fossils, see pictures of fossils millions of years old beside pictures of their living counterparts and witness the defeat of evolution in the light of these fossils.
http://www.creation-museum.net/fossils/
.
2006-10-08 11:39:22 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Eveolutionist are liars plain and simple!!!!!
2006-10-08 11:45:33 · answer #1 · answered by dreamangel20051 2 · 0⤊ 6⤋
"Millions of Years Old Fossils Refute Evolution"
Thirteen mammal skeletons. OOOOOH! What a thorough sampling. There are more orders of Eutheria alone. This is what happens when you scour the world, rejecting 99.999% of the data that contradicts you objectives, focusing on the remaining 0.001% which can be argued either way. At least they can focus on organisms the evolved without major morphological change and can point out the similarities without pointing out the differences.
I had to turn of my speakers to stop the sound of facts being twisted to death. I loved how they describe things that clearly prove evolution, throw out some folksy but unrelated analogy, and then say it disproves it. At least they've got the format of their lies standardized.
Summary, they argue against the Biblical age of the world, and don't have any real science to back them up. Creationists hail it anyway since they will edit out what they don't like. Scientists get a good laugh. A petrified turd of the highest magnitude.
2006-10-08 17:00:51 · answer #2 · answered by novangelis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That does not do anything to dispute evolution. Organisms that are adapted to their environment do not need to change - evolution is brought by pressures to change or go extinct. Insects - the primary fossils in that exhibit - are a prime example. Sharks and crocodiles are another - they are such well adapted predators there hasn't been any need for them to undergo major changes. As far as the large Pleistocene mammals, those are relatively recent in evolutionary terms. The didn't however show animals like the horse, that has a well documented evolutionary record for a small dog like forager with five toes to a large one toed grazer. What about whales? We know quite a bit on their evolution from a pig like land animal to an aquatic mammal. What they do have doesn't really do anything to dispute evolution at all.
2006-10-08 12:16:06 · answer #3 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And your question is? No, evolutionists would not tell which part of the fosils on display is a lie. Because unless the fossil is a reproduction, it can't be a lie. Actually, I've never been lied to by a fossil, regardless of its authenticity. Inanimate objects don't talk to me that often. And why would they have fossil on display that are lies? There are plenty to support their theory.
2006-10-08 11:45:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
So, what is this supposed to tell us? That these things look the same as they did 250 million years ago?
Not everything evolves. Evolution is basically adapting to your envronment. If there were ants living 250 million years ago and doing the same thingsd thay did today, eating the same things that eat today then there was no change in their environment and therefore they didnt have to evolve. Evolution happen when something HAS to chage, not just because time passes.
Read, read , read. And dont believew everything you see on the internet is true. Oh wait I forget, words that are written down HAVE to be true.
2006-10-08 11:47:05 · answer #5 · answered by wilchy 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I lol'd.
Oh wow, by Harun Yahya? Even better xD Always good for a laugh.
Seriously, if you knew anything about evolution you'd see the funny side to this.
2006-10-08 22:58:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL!
Yeah, like the "creation museum" is a credible source for evidence.
*snicker*
2006-10-08 14:27:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You'd better do better at articulating your question. I went to the site and I don't understand what you're even asking.
2006-10-08 11:57:52 · answer #8 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How absurd and anti-intellectual. How many T-rex fossils are in teh creation museum? how many velociraptors?.... it's not what you are showing, but what they are NOT showing that shows how idiotic the creation myth apologists are.
2006-10-08 11:45:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Evolution is voodoo science, that has no proof. Life can't evolve from non-life, a proven fact because scientists were unable to do it.
Darwin made a monkey out of all the evolutionists.
2006-10-08 11:48:52 · answer #10 · answered by Born Again Christian 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Bible-whore.
2006-10-08 11:57:36 · answer #11 · answered by reverenceofme 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋