Do you know "Gospel of Barnabas"? Have your read Chapter 39 of the Gospel?

Question

Any Christian scholar of Christian history will readily confirm that after the famous council of Nicea (325 AD), the church of St. Paul (The Roman Catholic Church) selected out of the over three hundred Gospels in their possession the four that most closely conformed to their doctrines. All others, including the Gospel of Barnabas, were ordered completely destroyed. They also ruled that all Gospels written in Hebrew were to be destroyed. An edict was issued that anyone found in possession of an unauthorized Gospel would be put to death. Countless numbers of Christians were then systematically killed as heretics and burned at the stake if they maintained their belief in the divine Unity of God and did not conform to the innovative teachings of Paul. It is well known that this practice continued until at least the year 1616 AD. Read Chapter 39.

http://www.barnabas.net/chapter_index.htm

Answer 1

Maybe some of those gospels were ignored because they were false? Any Joe off the street can write a book "I knew that Jesus guy and he said it was okay to smoke pot" That doesn't mean it really happened.
Maybe the four gospels were selected because they were backed up by evidence and they corraberated with each other.

And incidentally, if Paul's gospel was so innovative, why did Peter, John and James agree with him?

Answer 2

They make up an reply for that: that you just on no account truthfully believed within the first location, despite the fact that you probably did. Or that you're going to pass to heaven it doesn't matter what. They probably instances quote the verse approximately being within the hand of God and being not able to be snatched away, however Jesus is speakme approximately those in order to be in heaven, no longer the humans on the planet. Now a few humans will say that's no longer a right interpretation, however the early Church Fathers (John of Demascus for certain) interpreted that passage to be relating to humans in heaven, and he even used that passage to look after the dignity of the saints, who're in heaven. So who're you going to suppose? Some man that began a church a couple of years in the past, or two,000 years of Church historical past? My cash is at the later. OSAS is a fake instructing.

Answer 3

Looks like you got suckered into believing the biggest Muslim forgery known to modern times. No one except Muslims believe the Gospel of Barnabas is authentic. It was written no earlier than the year 1400. It's longer than all the other four gospels combined, and it makes references to contemporary events as if they were happening in the time the gospel was supposably written. Don't be a sucker. Do the research.

"The Gospel is considered by the majority of academics (including Christians and some Muslims) to be late, pseudepigraphical and a pious fraud; however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work edited to conform to Islam, perhaps Gnostic (Cirillo, Ragg) or Ebionite (Pines) or Diatessaronic (Joosten), and some Muslim scholars consider it genuine. Some Islamic organizations cite it in support of the Islamic view of Jesus; Islamic views are treated below."

Nice try, Muslim

Answer 4

wow. that is really interesting. i always wondered what was written in those lost gospels. this is kinda confusing though. i mean we know that Jesus'followers made the christian church which later split in orthodox and catholic. but there was nothing said in the bible abt muslims. is that thing authentic? it's really a weird turn to what i've learnt in school and stuff. i myself am orthodox, but i didn't knew anything abt that message and stuff. it makes u wonder...

Answer 5

That s terribly sad if that is the truth, and it is so horrible for one Christian or group thereof, to kil another!