English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ok, whatever, yes...i do know it was a romance movie...BUT...she made him draw her without clothes and she slept with him even though she met him like a few days later. who agrees?

2006-10-08 10:46:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

8 answers

i don't think she was easy - Jack & Rose shared some pretty amazing magical moments & they fell in love, lots of people have their portraits painted in the nude by a total stranger & nuthin ever happens - they had a real connection & did what came natural to express their love for one another

2006-10-08 10:51:28 · answer #1 · answered by JeenaBlahBlahBlah 3 · 0 0

More importantly than being easy, she was a cheater. Even if her fiancee was a jerk. She cheated.

2006-10-08 17:48:28 · answer #2 · answered by Mel 3 · 0 0

welll shes easyy becuzz she had sex with himm

but the movie is showing that it was love at first sight and they were soulmatesss its all how u look at it :[p

2006-10-08 17:49:26 · answer #3 · answered by balla4lifee16 1 · 0 0

I dodn't know but i can't watch that movie without crying. boooohhooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

2006-10-08 17:48:09 · answer #4 · answered by NonePlusTwo 1 · 0 0

No.

She was just a spoiled rich biotch.

2006-10-08 17:48:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

which rose the 18 year old one ----or the 87 year old one?

2006-10-08 17:48:08 · answer #6 · answered by darkangel1111 5 · 0 0

She wasnt in love with the other guy....Leonardo...was gorgeous and it was love at first sight...

2006-10-08 17:48:56 · answer #7 · answered by Lynne B 4 · 0 0

i do

2006-10-08 17:49:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers