English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Question is somewhat vague. The rates vary by whatever crime(s) were committed. And, it has been proven that with prisoners getting an education while incarcerated, the chances for committing another crime are greatly lowered. Although if you were to ask the liberals, they will tell you it is a big waste of THEIR tax dollars. How uneducated are these people? Do some research on it, I'm sure you will find some interesting facts on this subject.

2006-10-08 14:28:41 · answer #1 · answered by knownothing 4 · 0 0

I in basic terms help people who're keen to help themselves if given a decision. The literacy fee could join the subject yet once you verify out the detention center inhabitants maximum persons there have dependancy issues (drugs, alcohol). If there are rather going to be people who will reform then the dependancy matters could be addressed. despite if a guy or woman with an dependancy is in penal complex for j strolling there's a stable danger that the dependancy in some way carry approximately the arrest. intercourse offenders very not often are reformed and in serious case could be placed to death. analyze has shown an thrilling link between serial killers and head injuries yet why a killer is a killer rather does not remember in my opinion (until it rather is self protection) they could be prevented from repeat offenses so I say fry them.

2016-12-26 12:58:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Recidivism is about 30%. It'd be 50% but you allow a margin of error for the ones killed in the course of events, and the ones who get away with it. The stats'll scare you. And incarceration isn't a cure. It's a delaying tactic.

2006-10-08 10:46:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers