Yes, because it says so in the Bible, and we know the everything in the Bible is correct, because it says so in the Bible. The Bible is proof of all things you can't prove otherwise. And we know the Bible has no mistakes, because if there were any the Bible would point them out, but because it doesn't there must be no mistakes in the Bible making it factual. Wow this Christian logic is starting to make me dizzy.
2006-10-08 09:34:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by jedi1josh 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Can you prove Paul wasn't filled with the Holy Spirit?
Then take a hike...we believe what the Scripture says.
2006-10-08 09:34:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
boy oh boy People...
you can't use the book in question to prove/disprove
you need other sources than the author as proof
otherwise we would say Bush is right because he said there was WMD in Iraq....
well...there was but it was the stuff we made and sold to him, which was already destroyed and intended for Iran in '80's
but not the WMD that supposedly posed a threat to US in 2002 - 2003 no such proof
Paul's holey spirit story is full of holes and contradictions in any interpretation of the bible as he lies and discredits himself or contrasts the very author 'Jesus' he is said to fall under as his 'special' apostle or super apostle
I find being in the NOW more important than Paul or Joseph Smith did 150 years ago or David Koresh 13 years ago or Warren Jeffs did this year
2006-10-08 09:37:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Wouldn't it be much easier to prove that he was a mentally disturbed, meglomaniac who profitted greatly from pioneering what was then the "new" religion of Xtianity? Actually, this question isn't so meaningless for us non-believers (Or should I say ANTIbelievers!)Most of what contemporary Xtianity teaches is PAULISM, with very little emphasis on the original teachings of John and Jesus-two excommunicated Essenes who saw Judaism's hypocrisy and went Gnostic.
2006-10-08 09:39:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Acts 13:9 Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,) filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him
2006-10-08 09:31:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
God's Word is the proof. After all, you used it to believe that someone named Paul existed to make that claim.
HA HA HA HA HA
2006-10-08 09:41:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Born Again Christian 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess if someone wrote it down, it must be true. DO NOT show these people the national inquirer by the way. There might be a few that are not quick enough to realize it is not a bible and start reading it. That would cause chaos.
2006-10-08 09:35:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yeah I saw the 'Yellow Submarine', that was some Holy Spirit work there! hehehehe
2006-10-08 09:32:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
How could anyone prove meaningless twaddle like that?
2006-10-08 09:33:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by eantaelor 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Can you prove that he wasn't?
There are some people out there somewhere that CAN prove that he was but NOBODY can prove that he wasn't.
2006-10-08 09:30:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by JesusFreak 2
·
1⤊
2⤋