English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

The three bikes you've mentioned here are all from different segments.
The Karizma is a 223cc bike.
Pulsar DTS-i is a 180
and the new CBZ is a 150
The details for the new CBZ are a bit sketchy at the moment.
Amongst the Pulsar & Karizma... The 180 is better
Better pick-up (really, the 180 has better 0-60 figures)
Better top-end (the Karizma maxes out at 118 but this one does 123)
Better handling (lighter and more agile)
The only real advantage that the Karizma holds is high speed stability, which makes it better for long highway runs.

2006-10-08 05:59:32 · answer #1 · answered by Umang 2 · 0 0

hey dude;
its got 2 b d pulsar 180 dtsi / pulsar 150 dtsi. thse machines r d killers dude.
Looks, style, performance , mileage they've got d works.

d 180 can kick some serious *** compared 2 d karizma. w/regards to top speed, mileage & pick up too

i own a pulsar 150, man it can kick d **** out of d CBZ xtreme on ne given day take it from me. just c d way d bike responds to acceleration man. n its got some serious styling too as well. n a low profile which gives u better grip of d road (17" mags compared to 18" mags of d CBZ xtreme)

2006-10-10 07:48:26 · answer #2 · answered by ferdy c 1 · 0 0

The rating depends on your:
1. Requirement :- a) kms./ per day
b) Pick up etc.
2. Feasibility / availibity at show-room,
3. Ability to purchase - cash available,
4. Types of riders & roads & many other reasons.

2006-10-08 05:48:29 · answer #3 · answered by kingofuniverse 3 · 0 0

karizma.......its sexy

2006-10-09 08:32:45 · answer #4 · answered by debikachakraborty 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers