English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

good 1, honestly i don't know its a double edge sword, yea its good for edu in prison, you know might keep someone from coming back or raise there quility of living after released, but on the other hand down falls tax dollars, and look at a person who is free and can't get education. Is it right for a person who is in prison for something wrong to get rewarded with education so i say it should but i can understand the arguments to not allow edu in jail

2006-10-08 03:50:34 · answer #1 · answered by raradaone 2 · 0 0

I'm all for rehabilitation. But at some point you have to wonder if they should be "rewarded" with an education. We the tax payers, already spend enough money housing and feeding societies' outcasts. Mandatory education would just mean more money. We would have to pay for teachers, and teaching supplies as well. There is already a shortage of good teachers in this country. We need those good teachers in our schools teaching our children, not our prisoners.

2006-10-08 03:52:36 · answer #2 · answered by Nep-Tunes 6 · 0 0

Definitely a good idea, especially for those to be released back into society. Not only will it benefit the prisoner in terms of development, but it will serve the public good, too. It is to the public benefit for the prisoners to assimilated back into society as productive members.

If educating prisoners will help to reach that goal, then educate them. It will be much cheaper to educate them and help them become productive citizens, than to put them back into prison. The recidivism rate is high for prisoners. Education should help to reduce that rate.

2006-10-08 03:57:05 · answer #3 · answered by Gin Martini 5 · 0 0

What is really needed is to put these men to work 12 hours a day except for Sundays. Make prison something you don't want to go to, yet make the men benefit society. Give them hard jobs nobody wants. It is prison for crying out loud.

2006-10-08 03:52:45 · answer #4 · answered by pshdsa 5 · 0 0

Personally, I feel when one commits an act against society, they LOSE a certain amount of rights.
I think they should all work, and be able to pay their own way, and have some money saved to fall on when they get out.
And I think instead of being bombarded with NOISE all day long wihich turns them psychotic. They should have to use
earplugs for radios and TVs, and maybe even be required to listen to RELAXING sounds and music at night.

2006-10-08 04:13:34 · answer #5 · answered by zenbuddhamaster 4 · 0 1

pay attention of karma or you would be able to get your want for detention center reform and then finally end up in detention center your self for something you probably did no longer do. bear in suggestions, the justice equipment isn't ideal and there are various human beings doing time for issues they did no longer do. My adoptive dad went to detention center for something he for sure did no longer do. He very almost died there because of the fact of loss of scientific care. Prisons are no longer as mushy as you will p.c. to have faith (there are mean human beings there who will scouse borrow your food and sexually molest you). the sturdy element is that my dad was once in the army specific forces and human beings discovered to no longer mess with him. that's for that reason that the warden made him the detention center librarian so as that the prisoners would quit stealing the books. :) Edit: Segregation does no longer quit racial stress, it in basic terms makes it worse. you're taking the possibility of beginning riots because of the fact one racial team will accuse the detention center of giving extra privileges to a distinctive racial team. additionally, what do you do with a guy or woman who's multiracial? would the "one drop rule" be in result on your proposed detention center equipment? What if there's a guy or woman who's white, black, Asian and Hispanic all on the comparable time?you would be beginning up an extremely risky can of worms with this theory. My organic and organic father became a blond Caucasian yet grew up between Hispanics and spoke Spanish extra beneficial than English. the place would you placed him? by the way, I in no way had a communicate with my dad the place he did no longer blend a minimum of somewhat Spanish together with his English. I continuously felt there became a in no way ending language and cultural barrier between us (i did no longer get to understand him until the age of 18), even nonetheless my dad did no longer have a drop of Latino blood in him.

2016-12-26 12:41:51 · answer #6 · answered by everitt 3 · 0 0

I SAY YES BECAUSE THE INMATES ALREADY HAVE 1 STRIKE AGAINST THEM FOR BEING INCARCERATED. THERE ARE MANY THAT WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE WHEN THEY ARE RELEASED AND NEED SOMETHING TO LOOK FORWARD TO. AN EDUCATION CAN SOMETIMES OVER-SHADOW THE FACT THAT THEY WERE LOCKED UP WHEN IT COMES TO EMPLOYMENT. ALSO, IT MAY HELP TO KEEP THE PERSON FROM RETURNING TO A LIFE OF CRIME IF THEY CAN DO SOMETHING PRODUCTIVE ONCE RELEASED.

2006-10-08 03:52:57 · answer #7 · answered by urfantasyishere 4 · 1 0

Not a good idea - if the prisoners aren't interested in trying to improve themselves, let them sit there and rot.

2006-10-08 03:46:52 · answer #8 · answered by Asher S 4 · 0 1

I feel, tht there could be some who want to study, but because of some tough guys, they must not be having the guts to say tht they want one. There could also be some who don't know the value of education, hence don't want it , so if it's made compulsory, they benift, and this could help them to become better persons

2006-10-08 03:50:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes because people who dont have their g.e.d. yet that way they can get it because when they get out of prison they can get a stable job

2006-10-08 03:52:31 · answer #10 · answered by sissy_crier 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers