Just curious, in the below question, is anywhere in the question or the details the word abortion mentioned by the asker?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnJOS5NnU7wd37Xt_Bve2YHsy6IX?qid=20061007215015AAWlQC9
2006-10-07 17:54:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I was making a point that obviously went way over your head.
Sorry I will try to be less intelligent when answering any other questions you ask.
You were talking about children and how it does not make sense to own them as slaves, I stated that is equal to what we do when we in modern times in treating children as things, in example, children are not human so it is okay murder them (abortion). That was the equivalency I was drawing in this instance.
Again, it takes more than average intelligence to understand such things.
Obviously you and many others are of less than average intelligence.
2006-10-07 17:59:12 · answer #1 · answered by Adyghe Ha'Yapheh-Phiyah 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do the answers have to include only words asked in the question? Or, in your view, are people free to make and share the associations that the questions produce in them?
The question is your choice. The answer is not....although you can always choose the BEST answer.
Hoping the best for you anyway...
2006-10-07 18:08:29 · answer #2 · answered by Debra N 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No there is no mention of Abortion by the asker.
Maybe if we use the Bible code software we could find it though.
2006-10-07 17:59:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
nope, but Adyghe198...made sense.. and in a round about way she is slinging the same kind of answer back.. both make no sense.. it's OK to kill a child, but you will argue over one being a slave??
as for the slave question, times were different .. they would call grown men the child of so and so in the Bible.
2006-10-07 18:01:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
no i dont find any mention of abortion mentioned by the asker
2006-10-07 17:59:47 · answer #5 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess they went with the "child as property" and made an oblique extrapolation
2006-10-07 17:57:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope-- but they don't trust you so are looking for the underlying reason for the Q.
2006-10-07 17:58:23 · answer #7 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope, but that doesn't stop people from seeing what they want to see.
2006-10-07 17:58:30 · answer #8 · answered by anabasisx 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
some people have a specific agenda no matter what it is you aske them
peace be on you
2006-10-07 17:58:52 · answer #9 · answered by Submission 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I read the whole thing! I can't find it! I don't think it's there!
2006-10-07 17:58:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋