Who do you think would make a better lawyer, a Christian or an Atheist. I would say the Christian because they are able to convince others that it is true and maintain the majority of our population, while having mounds of evidence showing that the Bible is not factual. While the Atheist has all of the evidence in his favor, yet still remains the minority of our population.
2006-10-07 16:54:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
the thing that differs most atheist from most Christians is that they do not all go around trying to convince others that their way is right. most are happy just living their life.
2006-10-07 17:02:10 · answer #1 · answered by Lexi 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Now, to be truthfull, you can reverse those arguements you've made. The Atheist has little evidence also, and the Christian also has a lot of evidence to support them.
Now, am I a Christan paralegal, or am I an Atheist paralegal?
2006-10-07 23:57:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you are guilty of a crime but need to be proven innocent, having a Christian layer is the way to go, since they are so good at deceiving people. But if you are the plaintiff, then having a Atheist lawyer would be the way to go, since they are good at digging up the facts.
2006-10-08 00:02:27 · answer #3 · answered by jedi1josh 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The one who did better in law school and has a better track record of wins versus losses in court.
2006-10-07 23:57:17 · answer #4 · answered by WhyAskWhy 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why do you lie, and have a wicked tongue that is full of poison?
2006-10-07 23:57:14 · answer #5 · answered by Investigation Specialist 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋