2006-10-07 16:45:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
may be no because i think romans dont care much religinon because they were pagans
but jesus was calling jews people that god give him relgion but they didnt accept him so he represented a threat to thier positions
2006-10-07 17:05:43 · answer #1 · answered by micho 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. The Romans could have cared less about the religious concerns of the people in Jerusalem. The Romans were pagan at the time and had no concept of blasphemy and the like.
But anyway, the Jews did exist in Jerusalem, its being their homeland and all. This is why Jesus went there. He wouldn't have gone there if not for the Jews.
2006-10-07 23:53:02 · answer #2 · answered by Gestalt 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe there can be a
right answer to your question. If the Jews weren't in Jerusalem, then possibly the Romans wouldn't have been in Jerusalem either. There are too many variables to be able to answer your question with any proof.
2006-10-08 00:03:32 · answer #3 · answered by Emma 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since Jesus was a Jew himself, if there were no Jews in Jerusalem, Jesus wouldn't have been there either, and there was no one to crucify.
2006-10-08 09:47:15 · answer #4 · answered by Ilham Aliyev 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good Question. But everythings happens for a reason.
2006-10-07 23:49:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
then im pretty sure Jesus wouldn't be in jerusalem,no?
2006-10-07 23:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by STAR POWER=) 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
since it was the will of God to send his son to be a sacrifice, yes.
2006-10-08 00:54:35 · answer #7 · answered by candi_k7 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋