English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

I can only tell you that Buddha 100% for sure did not advocate violence. On the contrary, compassion not only for all human beings but for all sensitive beings (i.e. also animals)... Buddhism has never been used to justify any war, terrorist attack, killing or crusade.

as for Mohammed and Jesus Christ... I would say their message sadly enough has been some times used to justify violence.

Krishna... I have no idea to be honest.

2006-10-07 16:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by G 6 · 0 0

No Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him) did not use voilence. Nor did christ or budda i dont think. And i dont know about Krishna.

The reason so many things go on about the Muslim Prophet being voilent is because there is a new type of Islam that has come out, which is not really "Islam". It is just a bunch of people who dont really know about Islam, but just want to target their hate on others for their own comfort "needs".

No prophet , or Christ or anyone use voilence to do anything.

2006-10-07 14:11:12 · answer #2 · answered by DudeWantsAnswers 3 · 0 1

None of these religious founders ever advocated violence. Prophet Muhammad only allowed war for self defence. Likewise the other founders. If you want a real perspective on religion, go read the Karen Armstrong books. A History of God, talks about the monotheistic religions and Mohammad is related to Islam. Karen Armstrong is an atheist, and former nun, who writes a very fair description of all religions. Please, if you really want to know about Islam, email me questions or find a very neutral source to explain the true religion.

2006-10-07 14:54:46 · answer #3 · answered by Nat 1 · 1 1

I don't know much about other religions. I did do a report on Islam in 8th grade, but that was 3 years ago. From what I remember he does say to destroy anyone who doesn't believe in Mohamed. I

I am a Christian. And i can completely honestly tell you that Jesus Christ never said to start violence. In fact he said that if someone strikes you on one cheek to turn and let him strike the other also.

2006-10-07 14:14:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Seriously...

Go out and buy the book, "The End of Faith" by Sam Harris. In that book he critiques peoples beliefs in general but there is a HUGE section with direct quotes from the Koran showing just how bad it is.

It's actually a really great book. It shows how beliefs shape our actions. As an example... You might think it's a great idea to suicide bomb a populated area killing innocent people if you firmly believe you will be rewarded by God in the afterlife for doing so.

2006-10-07 14:09:24 · answer #5 · answered by DiRTy D 5 · 1 2

Prophet Muhammad fought in wars only for self defense.
Idol worshippers were furious and sought to Murder Muhammad
when he began to preach that it was wrong to worship idols.
If the first Jews, Christians, and Muslims, didn't defend themselves against the Pagans and other groups they would have been killed off and the their religions would have vanished. They would not have been able to establish themselves. In Islam, you can not fight unless it is a act of self defense. The Pagans, when the Three major religions were being establish were very furious and sought to kill the Jews, Chri... Remember the Pagans were making money off of the idols. Here are the rules of war in he Quran:

Rules of War* Only in Self Defense

[2:190] You may fight in the cause of GOD against those who attack you, but do not aggress. GOD does not love the aggressors.

[2:191] You may kill those who wage war against you, and you may evict them whence they evicted you. Oppression is worse than murder. Do not fight them at the Sacred Masjid, unless they attack you therein. If they attack you, you may kill them. This is the just retribution for those disbelievers.

[2:192] If they refrain, then GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

[2:193] You may also fight them to eliminate oppression, and to worship GOD freely. If they refrain, you shall not aggress; aggression is permitted only against the aggressors.

[2:194] During the Sacred Months, aggression may be met by an equivalent response. If they attack you, you may retaliate by inflicting an equitable retribution. You shall observe GOD and know that GOD is with the righteous.

[2:195] You shall spend in the cause of GOD; do not throw yourselves with your own hands


If people didn't fight back against oppression, aggression would win out. Like what is happening in Dafur. When the people began defending themselves, the murders won't be able to continue.
Religion is based on survival, its evolution, the survivial of the fitest. That's why the U.S. convicts Murders, because without Law and Order they would be violent anarchy. But Islam teaches that after peace is established, Muslims must continue to maintain the peace. The Sucide bombers and the crusaders are/were not following religion or don't/didn't try to interpret the revelations correctly or have the desire.

[4:90] Exempted are those who join people with whom you have signed a peace treaty, and those who come to you wishing not to fight you, nor fight their relatives. Had GOD willed, He could have permitted them to fight against you. Therefore, if they leave you alone, refrain from fighting you, and offer you peace, then GOD gives you **no excuse to fight them***.

After the Muslims fought the Idol Worshipper during the Prophets time, Medina and Mecca were very peaceful. Think of it as if a group within the U.S. was trying to overthrow the U.S. government. In Mecca the Muslims, Christians, and Jews were living in peace. Remember before Prophethood Mecca was barbaric, they were stoning people for lax reasons and burying babies alive. It was horrible. They were the most babrbaric people on Earth at that time. If a group within the U.S. starting trying to murder government officals, wouldn't the U.S. troppers and secruity kill them? Yes, becasue if we didn't, other people would try to do the same thing. That's the same thing with other countries. Self defense and severve retritubution is essential in survivial. Without it, a lot of countries would have at it at destroying the U.S..

PROPHET MUHAMMAD DIDN'T MARRY A SIX YEAR OLD GIRL EARL D DUDE, SHE WAS IN HER LATE TEENS EARLY TWENTIES WHEN THEY HAD RELATIONS, YOUR SUNNAHS
ARE FICTIONAL AND EARL STOP SAYING SOMETHING IS FROM THE QURAN WHEN IT IS NOT

2006-10-07 14:41:49 · answer #6 · answered by Muse 4 · 0 1

Here are some references, they may not be violent, but they sure are scarey:

Child Brides and Pedeophillia

Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)'

Blacks and Black Slavery

Volume 8, Book 73, Number 182:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah's Apostle was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels (very fast, and there were women riding on those camels). Allah's Apostle said, "Waihaka (May Allah be merciful to you), O Anjasha! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (women)!"

Volume 9, Book 91, Number 368:

Narrated 'Umar:

I came and behold, Allah's Apostle was staying on a Mashroba (attic room) and a black slave of Allah's Apostle was at the top if its stairs. I said to him, "(Tell the Prophet) that here is 'Umar bin Al-Khattab (asking for permission to enter)." Then he admitted me.

Quran Surah 9:61 Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, `If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey's.'"


Health, Food and Drink

Quran Sahih Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 4, Number 234--Narrated Abu Qilaba: "Anas said, "Some people of 'Ukl or 'Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the Prophet (Muhammad)ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) camels and to ((((drink their milk and urine)))) (as a medicine).

2006-10-07 14:10:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Definitely NOT. None of these religions do. It's ppl who destort religion. Lord, forgive us, the sinners!

2006-10-07 14:11:22 · answer #8 · answered by lugil 2 · 0 0

Even if none of them did, which for all I know may be true, enough of all their followers do to make it a moot point.

2006-10-07 14:11:39 · answer #9 · answered by John's Secret Identity™ 6 · 0 0

To get a detailed explaination of your question or any other charges against Islam or Muslims, please check these Websites. These websites are in fact the Answers you may need.

http://www.muslim-answers.org/
http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac.htm

2006-10-07 14:39:29 · answer #10 · answered by Who am I? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers