terrorism is killing others without any reasons like osama ben laden
terrorism useing the violence against citizens like israel in lebanon
terrorism is makeing a war for a joke reason ( that iraq will have the nuclear boomb after 45 minutes )
terrorism is occuping lands of other nations ( palastinian people under occupation for over 50 years _ shebaa lebanese land _ golan syrian land )
terrorism is useing the united nation for serving the big countries not for poor people which it held for
2006-10-07 07:01:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by micho 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
In the UK it comes from the Terrorism Act 2000 part 1 section 1. As follows;
PART I
INTRODUCTORY
1. - (1) In this Act "terrorism" means the use or threat of action where-
(a) the action falls within subsection (2),
(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and
(c) the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause.
(2) Action falls within this subsection if it-
(a) involves serious violence against a person,
(b) involves serious damage to property,
(c) endangers a person's life, other than that of the person committing the action,
(d) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or
(e) is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.
(3) The use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1)(b) is satisfied.
(4) In this section-
(a) "action" includes action outside the United Kingdom,
(b) a reference to any person or to property is a reference to any person, or to property, wherever situated,
(c) a reference to the public includes a reference to the public of a country other than the United Kingdom, and
(d) "the government" means the government of the United Kingdom, of a Part of the United Kingdom or of a country other than the United Kingdom.
(5) In this Act a reference to action taken for the purposes of terrorism includes a reference to action taken for the benefit of a proscribed organisation.
2006-10-09 04:25:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by neetsoprano 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The word terrorism has aquired a larger meaning than ever before and it is worse than fascism and despotism of Hitler and the like in the history of the world.It is acknowledged globally that any power weilded in a group of people who kill other people whether for religion or for power for themselves and who violate all basic human rights and freedom are terrorists.They are evil against people all over the world.
2006-10-07 07:03:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ramraj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
George W Bush
2006-10-07 23:10:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most terrorism is conducted by the secret services, primarily CIA/MI6/Mossad/ISI, who between them are responsible for 9/11, 7/7, Madrid train bombing, Bali bombing, Mumbai train bombing, Lockerbie air disaster, and loads more.
The way to eradicate terrororism would therefore be to dispose of the secret services.
2006-10-10 00:47:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
technically the dictionary defines it as
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
2006-10-07 06:53:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by arthur d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have seen it defined as the use of violence or threats to inspire a state of fear, for the purpose of serving a political end.
IE, just what George Bush and John Howard have been doing the last few years.
2006-10-07 12:15:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by TC 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
9/11/2000
2006-10-10 21:41:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Loganathan Raja Rajun R 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read the response given by Arthur D.
It sounds like he is describing the Bush Administration.
2006-10-07 07:00:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
terrorism is defined by the FBI and others with different wording.
but it entails a threat or act of violence to disrupt or cause chaos for a certain government or its people
2006-10-07 09:24:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋