English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

so i would be interested in how the pro-immigration mob are going to defend this-bearing in mind that windsor is in england-the soldiers english making this their home.???

2006-10-07 06:28:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

it is my beleif that when our brave soldiers fight in a foreign land they should come home to a heros welcome-not the case here sadly. instead they are driven from their home by the very same people they fought to defend. there will be civil war in the UK within ten years.

2006-10-07 06:38:54 · update #1

if this had of happened in 1945 there would have been a public outcry. churchill would never have heard the end of it.

2006-10-07 06:48:10 · update #2

6 answers

This is terrible and one of the worse stories, I have heard. Is this a take over of your country and it's people. Stand United and don't let this happen. They won't serve or defend your country, but they will try to take it over and kill every one of the citizens who are not Muslim. Get your people organized. Do it now, or it will soon be too late.

2006-10-07 11:43:05 · answer #1 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 2 0

This is the irony of advocating the principles of democracy or social equality. There is a consequence of giving migrants equality when they are disrespectful of the laws and what the country's represent. Immigration laws are not enforced rightfully to screen people that will not bite the hands that essentially give them better opportunities and to be able to live in peace. It seemed their cultural or religious adherence seems to contribute chaos and divisiveness in oppose to what they shld contribute positively to the sponsoring country in return for granting residency.

And even if you are a native UK citizens and detached of such religious affiliations and do not approve the country's participation in Afghan war, you simply have no right to drive these soldiers out of their homes. Such acts calls for extreme measure of punishment and deterrence.

2006-10-07 06:44:37 · answer #2 · answered by fanofkeanur 3 · 0 0

How dare they? How dare ANY illegal immigrant.
What rights do they have over a legal citizen?
Illegal aliens should all be rounded up & deported

So why don't all your preachers of the following give me or the asker thumbs down,
Because if this is all the reasons below that you have got, your pathetic.
"Pro-Amnesty
" But.. We are all Gods children
" Everyone deserves the same rights"
" i belive in a fair world"
" How would you feel if you were them"
" They do jobs Americans won't.

2006-10-07 06:33:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

What is their Government doing about it ?
Muslims have to give up their old ways and conform to the ways of the country they have chosen to live in and abide by It's laws .. That's the way it works , people !
Maybe we should look around and see what is happening elsewhere too .

2006-10-07 06:36:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Today, a fearless Muslim advance has penetrated far deeper into Europe than Abd al-Rahman. They're in Brussels, where Belgian police officers are advised not to be seen drinking coffee in public during Ramadan, and in Malmo, where Swedish ambulance drivers will not go without police escort. It's way too late to rerun the Battle of Poitiers. In the no-go suburbs, even before the french current riots, 9,000 police cars had been stoned by ''French youths'' since the beginning of the year; some three dozen cars are set alight even on a quiet night. ''There's a civil war under way in Clichy-sous-Bois at the moment,'' said Michel Thooris of the gendarmes' trade union Action Police CFTC. ''We can no longer withstand this situation on our own. My colleagues neither have the equipment nor the practical or theoretical training for street fighting.''

What to do? In Paris, while ''youths'' fired on the gendarmerie, burned down a gym and disrupted commuter trains, the French Cabinet split in two, as the ''minister for social cohesion'' (a Cabinet position I hope America never requires) and other colleagues distance themselves from the interior minister, the tough-talking Nicolas Sarkozy who dismissed the rioters as ''scum.'' President Chirac seems to have come down on the side of those who feel the scum's grievances need to be addressed. He called for ''a spirit of dialogue and respect.'' As is the way with the political class, they seem to see the riots as an excellent opportunity to scuttle Sarkozy's presidential ambitions rather than as a call to save the Republic.

A few years back I was criticized for a throwaway observation to the effect that ''I find it easier to be optimistic about the futures of Iraq and Pakistan than, say, Holland or Denmark." But this is why. In defiance of traditional immigration patterns, these young men are less assimilated than their grandparents. French cynics like the prime minister, Dominique de Villepin, have spent the last two years scoffing at the Bush Doctrine: Why, everyone knows Islam and democracy are incompatible. If so, that's less a problem for Iraq or Afghanistan than for France and Belgium.

If Chirac isn't exactly Charles Martel, the rioters aren't doing a bad impression of the Muslim armies of 13 centuries ago: They're seizing their opportunities, testing their foe, probing his weak spots. If burning the 'burbs gets you more ''respect'' from Chirac, they'll burn 'em again, and again. In the current issue of City Journal, Theodore Dalrymple concludes a piece on British suicide bombers with this grim summation of the new Europe: ''The sweet dream of universal cultural compatibility has been replaced by the nightmare of permanent conflict.'' Which sounds an awful lot like a new Dark Ages.

The echoes can be heard in many neighborhoods of north and east London, where Sajid Sharif, 37, a trained civil engineer who goes by the name Abu Uzair, once handed out incendiary leaflets preaching his brand of extreme Islam. From the comfort of his home, he leads the Savior Sect, a group that claims several hundred supporters and seeks to unite all Muslims worldwide under a strict conception of Islamic law. That might seem fanciful--except that Uzair's mentor, Omar Bakri Muhammad, was one of the first clerics to lose his right to live in Britain under the new antiterrorism laws. He was barred from returning after a holiday abroad. Uzair says he isn't concerned about the threat of eviction because he is British born, and his lawyer has reportedly told him he has little to worry about. "Anyway," says Uzair, "it is all in the hands of Allah."

Uzair is bearded, wears a long white gown and quotes nonstop from the Koran and Hadith (a collection of the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad). His Pakistani parents are secular Muslims, he says, and speak very little English. In his youth he smoked and went to night clubs. It was not until he was a university student in Britain that he embraced Islam. "I wanted some inner discipline," he says. "Since I have come to Islam, I have a lot of tranquillity." Now he tries to steer people away from drugs, drink, crime and smoking. Uzair's supporters refuse to vote in elections because his sect recognizes only Shari'a, Islamic law. While he does not openly support terrorism, he declares that the July 7 attacks were retaliation for Britain's support of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. "The majority of Muslims in the U.K. are frustrated, but they cannot speak," he says. "They will not condone the London bombings, but inside they believe that Britain had it coming."

2006-10-07 06:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

its pathetic, they are everywhere

2006-10-07 06:31:07 · answer #6 · answered by leigha 5 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers