Even I cannot answer that question without doing some research.
This is probably better asked in the science forum.
You will get nothing but beliefs, feelings, and heresay in this forum.
2006-10-07 06:25:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mere Mortal 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
carbon dating IS reliable up to +/- about 20%. This means if they determine a certain thing is 10 million years old, it might be as much as 12 million years old or as little as 8 million years old. Either way I think that qualifies as 'very old', don't you?
2006-10-07 06:26:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless you are biased against a young earth, you will benefit from examining the results of the RATE project, recently completed by scientists with ICR.
2006-10-07 06:28:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by John 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Big Bang is reckoned to have occured 14 Billion years ago, I think that is 14000,000,000. personally I can't get my head around the figure of fourteen thousand million can you?
2006-10-07 06:33:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One doesn't relate to the other and carbon 14 is reliable.
2006-10-07 06:25:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by tammidee10 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Science questions are not likely to find well-informed answers in the Religion & Spirituality section of Y!A. You are more likely to get examples of emotional whimpering, fearful of anything that has the potential of pricking the superstitious bubble of faith.
2006-10-07 06:26:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
E=mc^2. It is only terrestrial! That is why aliens are needed to help us figure this stuff out!!!
2006-10-07 06:24:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stephanie D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can use radioactive isotopes other than those of carbon to date things (things with longer half lives)
2006-10-07 06:24:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
you are very confusing
2006-10-07 06:26:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by crl_hein 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
not astronomy here...doesnt matter
2006-10-07 06:26:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋