Is there some particular reason you are asking so many questions regarding circumcision, circumcision and sex, and other circumcision related questions? Perhaps if you just came out and asked your question, we could answer these things once and for all. You have asked variants of all of the above questions over the past week, and by now should have a good variety of answers to choose from. Unless you are just fixated on the foreskin, I see no reason to continue the polls.
2006-10-06 22:12:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by The mom 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
1. Yes my son is circumsized..
2. Yes I have had both circumcised and uncircumcised partners...
3. I prefer circumcised
4. Asthetically speaking a circumcised penis appeals to me more than an uncircumcised penis... I am not saying I couldn't have a long term relationship with an uncircumcised man just that circumcised is more pleasing asthetically...
5. When an uncircumcised penis is erect and the forskin is retracted properly the feel is about the same as with a circumcised penis... The real difference is when the penis is not erect and the forskin is able to hood the glans...
6 refer to #1 .....
2006-10-06 22:34:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Diane (PFLAG) 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Have you had both circumcised and uncircumcised partners?
Why yes I certainly have.
Which do you prefer?
I have no preference.
Why?
A great lover or a lousy lover is not dependent on having a foreskin or not having a foreskin.. it has everything to do with the operator of the penis..
How did intercourse feel different?
What makes you think intercourse felt different? I guess that's a silly question too.. I would assume no two men are going to make intercourse feel the same.. which brings me back to my last answer... Feeling great or feeling "blah" depends more on the operator of the penis and not the penis itself.
would/did u circumcise your boys?
I have one son and yes he's circumcised.. I did tons of research.. listened to real life people and not anticirc activists on the internet (from both viewpoints) What it all boiled down to is there's nothing wrong with having a circ'd penis and there's nothing wrong with not having a circ'd penis.. If a man learns proper hygiene.. he should have no problem living a long happy life with a nice healthy penis.. foreskin or no foreskin. There were benefits to being circ'd and there were benefits to not being circ'd.. I used my best mommy judgement and weighed heavily on my decision and now the only thing I have to worry about is if my son is going to grow up and hate me for making that choice. So ask yourself this.. besides people on the internet.. how many men do you know in real life that hate their mothers and fathers for having them circ'd? How many men do you know in real life that hate their parents for not having them circ'd?
2006-10-07 01:12:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by SassySista 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
My first son I did because I just thought that was what you're supposed to do. My second son I didn't because when he was born the skin was such that there wasn't enough of a fold or whatever and they were worried about doing the procedure until he was older. They wanted to do it at one year of age which would be like actual surgery. I refused to do it all in that case. I did research then and found out how very unnecessary it is. I'm pregnant again and if this child is a boy he will not be circumcised. If I had to do over my first one would't be either.
2006-10-06 23:03:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Amelia 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should not circumcise . There are no health benefits and it is just an ancient form of mutilation. Spare him the pain. If God wanted people to be circumcised, don't you think He would have made them that way to start with? Intercourse is more pleasurable for both partners as well for an uncircumcised man.
2006-10-06 21:24:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by breezetucson 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes,I have been with both.
I prefer circumcised NO QUESTIONS ASKED,and everyone I know has agreed.
First of all,it looks MUCH nicer.Second of all,it's a lot cleaner and yes it DEFINITELY feels better!
I would definitely circumcise my son if I had one.
I have many times heard stories about men having serious problems as they got older during sex,and after visiting the doctor they were told it was a problem that had to do with the fact that they werent circumsiced.
2006-10-07 02:13:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by firefly 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Both of my sons are uncircumcised. What gives me the right to AMPUTATE a part of my son's body that he very well would want later? It isn't a question of whether, I prefer an uncircumcised or circumcised penis. It is whether THE MAN does. If he is circumcised, he doesn't know that he is missing 75% of the sexual sensitivity that the foreskin provides. Yes, someday, all baby boys grow into sexually active men, and they have a right to being intact. Would I cut off my daughter's vulva or clitoris because it is "more difficult to keep clean"? Let's face it- it's not the PRETTIEST thing in the world, but it sure does FEEL good. Did Mother Nature put this part on a boy's body by MISTAKE??? No- it is protective, and functional. We as girls learn to clean our parts. It is a very selfish decision to cut off part of our little boys' sex organ because we find it personally distasteful. After all, WE are not going to have sex with them...a woman who is perfect for them IS! I am not usually so outright with my feelings in my posts, but I am adamantly opposed to circumcision. It is barbaric, antiquated, ghastly, abusive, and selfish, not to mention the fact that it is ABSOLUTELY not MEDICALLY NECESSARY.
www.myshininglight.com
2006-10-07 02:25:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shining Light 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I had both of my boys circumsiced due to the fact that it can cause problems with infection down the line. My grandfather wasn't circumcised when he was born and had to have the surgery done at 50 due to infection complicated by diabetes - which made the surgery even more dangerous. I would rather have it done when they are first born and not run the risk of problems later down the line when it might be more dangerous to have the surgery.
2006-10-06 23:25:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shadowtwinchaos 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I had my son circumcised because I was told it would be hard to clean otherwise, then I was told it made no difference and I felt really bad cuz he had little tears, so I made him hurt for no reason and if I could go back I would not have had him circumcised cuz they told me he wouldnt feel it but his tears told me a different story
2006-10-06 22:30:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by This girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
my husband was uncurcumcised for the first 16 years we were married then because the skin quit retracting and was cracking he had to be circumcised at 40 years old. He made it through with no problem, it looks better, feels better, he says sex is better being circumcised I think every part of sex is better since he is circumcised. And its easier for him to keep clean.
2006-10-07 04:01:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋