Who to say they couldn't program it differantly then it original reason?
2006-10-06
18:56:39
·
13 answers
·
asked by
?
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
What ever the evil doer want it to do, there noting safe and protected and sane about it
2006-10-06
18:59:15 ·
update #1
Metal, Lithium, ect inplanted in the body sound like a night mare to me
2006-10-06
19:01:25 ·
update #2
Thanks but No Thanks At this time I will pass
2006-10-06
19:03:51 ·
update #3
20 Years after eveyone got them then if they aren't any problems then come and talk to me.
2006-10-06
19:05:31 ·
update #4
I smell a Rat in the Government and we are there lab rats
2006-10-06
19:12:07 ·
update #5
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html
2006-10-07
14:11:47 ·
update #6
Yes, security and safety will be extremely important.
But that doesn't mean that we should abandon the technology altogether.
People are always afraid when a new technology comes out. Cars are dangerous and they kill people all the time! And yet, the benefit is so great that people don't care.
Once tehcnology becomes safe enough, everyone will embrace it.
2006-10-06 18:59:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by PJ 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
DISADVANTAGES
"The chips do not incorporate any form of encryption which makes them extremely vulnerable to hacker attacks.
Potential threat with respect to invasion of privacy by a bogus reader, and the signal cloned. Due to the lack of encryption, the chips can be exploited through cloning which could lead to the criminal misuse of medical files and health insurance information. (i.e., modification of a medical file concerning the allergies of the rightful user of the chip).
Since the device uses radio waves as a means of interfacing scanners, there is a possibility that the data could be intercepted by a third party for consumer tracking purposes.
According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), implantation of the chip poses many health concerns including: adverse tissue reaction; migration of implanted transponder; failure of implanted transponder; failure of insertion; failure of electronic scanner; electromagnetic interference; electrical hazards; and magnetic resonance imaging incompatibility.
The incompatibility with MRI is the most serious concern because MRI machines use intense magnetic fields and pulsed radio frequency fields which could react adversely with the chips causing serious burns to patients. "
Pray never put in.
2006-10-06 20:01:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Born Valentine's Day 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
and whos to say you couldn't simply have it taken out?
remember they are a *EXTREMELY* long way off from chips that could actually interactively effect the person its implanted in in any way.
and also theres several ways they could MAKE the chip, it wouldn't neccesarily BE re-writable. that is that they would have to write the info permenantly, then implant it, or the implanted part only be a secure id signal, which would hitch into a online database for the information relevant to the use.
2006-10-06 19:02:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
there became some debate that those microchips ought to reason maximum cancers or different wellbeing problems. could you prefer that throughout your newborn, if that became the case? additionally, i could in no way conform to have a chip in my son. With the increasing wisdom of technologies, you should observe that technologies is additionally unquestionably manipulated. human beings can hack into laptop classes, scouse borrow passwords, etc. What if a pedophile have been able to hack into this methodology in charge for monitoring the youngsters? What if that pedophile published that wisdom on line? it is lots too volatile, in my view. additionally, to equate toddlers with pets could additionally seem to assert, "properly, my canines became spayed and that i don't prefer my teen daughter to get pregnant, so i gets her a tubal ligation." Your good judgment is improper. Natalie Holloway, IMO, ought to have widespread extra perfect than to talk to human beings she did not understand, exceptionally mutually as in another u . s . a .. She became staying out overdue and partying. She became probably eating. A microchip ought to not have prevented that. it is a shame what got here approximately to her, in spite of if it became frequently by way of detrimental options made. you should instruct your toddlers desirable values and morals, instruct them to be secure and careful of others, and not purely have confidence some gadget to do your interest. *thank you on your edit and the flaws you element out. confident, I push aside most of the main cancers claims and comprehend that we are all uncovered to all varieties of issues. yet while this gadget ought to unquestionably be hacked into by using extra risky human beings, i does not evaluate getting it for my newborn for that very reason. i think of that the hazards outweigh the advantages...and once you think of of each and every of the youngsters on the planet in recent times, it is a small volume that bypass lacking. To me, i does not prefer to do it. additionally, i think of it may be very high priced so I probably does not have the means to purchase it in any case.
2016-11-26 22:26:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK but what is the probability of that to happen, and what if they do away with currency altogether and use your thumbprint with the right knowledge you could be robbed blind.
2006-10-06 19:05:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by wicked jester 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sure... that happens all the time... I had a friend once that reprogrammed my chip... now every time I hear a car horn I bark like a cat.
2006-10-06 18:59:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by TheLizard 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/
Go there and ur mouth will drop... I could not stop talking about it. implant a Microchip Is what they r doin now in this nation.....
2006-10-06 19:11:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by --}--@STORMY@--}-- 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I always had the same concept..
2006-10-06 18:58:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Program it to do what?
2006-10-06 18:58:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
sounds reasonable
2006-10-06 18:58:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
2⤋