wasnt it the act of mating?
2006-10-06 17:42:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mrs D 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you believe in Creation.. the Chicken came first...
if you believe in Evolution.. then either 1. The egg came first if you define the chicken egg as an egg that hatches into a chicken.. or 2. The chicken came first if you only consider eggs as being chicken eggs if a chicken lays them...
by the way... if you don't specify chicken egg... then in evolution the egg came long before any chickens were even close to being formed.. fish have them.. frogs.. etc.
2006-10-07 00:44:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ♥Tom♥ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The chicken or the egg is a reference to the causality dilemma which arises from the expression "which came first, the chicken or the egg?". Since both the chicken and the egg create the other in certain circumstances (a chicken emerges from an egg; an egg is laid by a chicken) it is ambiguous which originally gave rise to the other. Purely logical attempts to resolve the dilemma result in an infinite regress, since an egg was caused by a chicken, which was caused by an egg, etc. Since every chicken originates from its egg, it seems obvious the egg came first. Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life. The solution may require an examination of syntax and may rely on verification from advances in modern genetic science. When used in reference to difficult problems of causality, the chicken and egg dilemma is often used to appeal to the futility of debate and lay it to rest.
History of the problem
The earliest reference to the dilemma is found in Plutarch's Moralia, in the books titled "Table Talk," in a series of arguments based on questions posed in a symposium. Under the section entitled, "Whether the hen or the egg came first," the discussion is introduced in such a way as to suggest that the origin of the dilemma was even older:
"...the problem about the egg and the hen, which of them came first, was dragged into our talk, a difficult problem which gives investigators much trouble. And Sulla my comrade said that with a small problem, as with a tool, we were rocking loose a great and heavy one, that of the creation of the world..."
Various answers have been formulated in response to the question, many of them humorous.
2006-10-10 11:19:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? asks Jessica Bolz, a student in Melville, NY.
Chicken or egg? Like a hall of mirrors at the carnival, each attempt at an answer just leads to another question. If the chicken came first, then didn't it hatch from an egg? And if the egg came first, wasn't it laid by a chicken? It's one of those questions that seem unanswerable.
Scientists agree on where chickens came from: In a sense, human beings invented them, just like they invented cows and pigs and other domesticated animals on Old MacDonald's Farm.
If chickens were interested in tracing their family trees, they would need to bone up on some DNA research done in Japan. Every chicken that ever lived can trace its ancestors, say researchers, to a particular subspecies of Red Jungle Fowl in Thailand.
The male Red Jungle Fowl looks a lot like a storybook rooster. But the Jungle Fowl isn't identical to a farm chicken. Unlike chickens, female Red Jungle Fowls have no combs. Another Jungle Fowl peculiarity: After mating season, males replace their bright red and orange ruff with a crop of dull, blackish feathers called "eclipse plumage."
(To see a Red Jungle Fowl in all its scarlet glory, visit the website www.centralpets.com/pages/critterpages/birds/wild_birds/WBD4315.shtml.)
Scientists think the first domestic chickens were bred from Red Jungle Fowls more than 8,000 years ago in the region now divided into Thailand and Vietnam. People bred chickens first for cockfighting contests, later for eggs and meat.
So the first official "chicken" pecked its way out of an egg laid by a bird that was not-quite-a-chicken. Depending on how you look at it, the egg--or the wild chicken--came first.
In creating the domestic chicken--and coming up with some 175 varieties--human beings also created a world where chickens rule the roost: There are more chickens than any other kind of domesticated bird on Earth.
And where did birds come from? Scientists think that a group of egg-laying feathered dinosaurs were probably the ancestors of today's birds. So if it weren't for dinosaurs, there wouldn't be any Jungle Fowl OR chickens.
We've solved the riddle of where chickens came from. But there's still the question of where eggs came from.
Scientists say eggs--handy miniature incubators of life, nutrients already packed inside--evolved more than 1 billion years ago, in the oceans of Earth. When land animals evolved about 250 million years ago, their eggs had a tough covering to retain moisture on dry land. Egg-layers like amphibians, reptiles, and insects flourished. The first "land eggs" pre-dated chickens by about 249,992,000 years.
So "the egg" may be one answer to the old riddle, but here's another, if a little longer: The chicken came after the bird, the bird came after the dinosaur, the dinosaur came after the egg. And the egg came long after the first single-celled bacteria, the prokaryotes, evolved in the oceans, some 3.5 billion years ago.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
If you believe in the Bible, the chicken came first. "And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. And God said, 'Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven'." Genesis 1:19-20. Chickens are a type of fowl, so the Christian Bible says that chickens came first.
If you have a different religion, you might have a different belief about the how the treasures of the earth came to be. In the science of evolution, both chickens and eggs came before man. Since both the birds and the eggs were on earth first, historians weren't around to record which came first.
Whichever answer you gave, it's okay. A chicken can't be born without a chicken egg and a chicken egg can't be laid without a chicken. Both chickens and eggs are important!
2006-10-07 00:44:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by nicolehaleyshane 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chicken!
2006-10-07 00:36:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The chicken of cos that it produce the eggs
2006-10-07 10:05:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by pisceslady a 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The egg. During evolution, the predecessor to chickens laid eggs which turned into the chickens that we know today.
2006-10-07 00:41:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by kittycat_cc14 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the chicken hatched from the egg, then the egg came first.
If the chicken laid the egg, then the chicken came first.
So simple, yet, so complex..
2006-10-07 00:42:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Boomer Wisdom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say the chicken because if you believe in God & the ark but then again he may have just used eggs hey? lol
2006-10-07 00:42:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by ausblue 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
chicken i think or was it the egg? no Definately the Chicken
2006-10-07 00:40:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by genesis_toy_and_hobby 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear friend,
Does it make any difference whatever came first have chicken receipes and or omlet enjoy food, if you are non vegeterian.
else just forget it and concentrate on your life theres much to think on about your own life " Successful & Significant Life" OR
" failure & dark life"
have creative productive positive thinking. Think big, have positive attitude and act.
live wonderful life.
Raj
2006-10-07 00:44:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by dreamsunltd 3
·
0⤊
0⤋