The whole "dancing angels" thingy never appeared in scripture.
The "eye of the needle" was actually a security device built into the gates of some cities (like Jerusalem). A camel (and camels carried a lot of stuff!) couldn't enter the city loaded. The animal had to be unloaded first, and then led through the smaller "camel gate" or "eye of the needle", often on its knees. Camels being cantankerous creatures, this is no easy task! Once through the "eye", the stuff could be carried through and re-loaded onto the camel, and the journey could continue. Point of all this? You don't get a camel caravan of weapons and a bunch of mercenaries walking into the gates disguised as "merchants". Hence greater security for the city.
Jesus compared getting rich people into heaven as harder than getting a camel through the needles' eye. He said harder, not impossible. But think about it: The camel has to be unloaded by others, humbled by others, led by others, especially to a place it wouldn't go if it had a choice, and then re-loaded! Seems a really good analogy to me, when you think about human nature.
2006-10-06 13:22:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by MamaBear 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You seem to be a student of secular society, so look it up.
Hint: In history, there were many gated cities. At night, the gate to the city would be closed and locked. If a traveler needed to get in , they could use the little opening beside the gate. It was called the eye of the needle because of its shape.
Their camels would have to be bared of all baggage that they were carrying, and the camel would have to get on its knees and crawl through the small opening, but it could be done.
It is the same way for us, we need to get rid of our baggage we are carrying and get down on our knees to enter into a relationship with God.
2006-10-06 13:16:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by cindy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's a perversion which came about in ancient Egypt. Basically they would coax the camel to go through the needle's eye and then, when it got its hump stuck half way through, it would be trapped and they would have their wicked way with it. They were highly intelligent and devious were those ancient Egyptians. I'm not surprised they they come up with that Pyramid idea; after all, they probably realised that there were only so many times you could have it away with a trapped camel, before the whole thing started becoming a bit mundane.
2006-10-06 13:14:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by John P 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
(1) So they will be able to accept other things that are impossible. Surely, you have heard of dexterity. It's all right up there with trying to push toothpaste back into the toothpaste tube again.
(2) They are working on new routines. If you had to deal with helping human beings all the time, that's where you'd be, too. They are all working on a new version of The Limbo Rock. This would explain the whole idea of Angels in Limbo. They will be back to help us again when they get through spinning upside-down on their heads.
2006-10-06 13:35:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
exciting concern. i'm throwing in my answer which in elementary words confirms what all and various else has already discovered. the precise minimum diameter required is 0.89561139330654. First, we keep in mind that the "waist" of the unit tetrahedron is a sq. of sides a million, or a diagonal of ?2, so as that the trick is getting the interest or ring over a minimum of two of the vertices, the minimum diameter ring required being someplace between parallel to between the unit edges (requiring diameter = a million) and to between the faces (requiring diameter = (2/3)?3 = a million.1547). enable x be the bottom of the isoceles triangle go component to the unit tetrahedron passing through between the vertices. the perimeters of that triangle go section is y = ?( (3/4) + ((a million/2) - x)² ). We employ Heron's formula (or in simple terms locate out altitude to exercising consultation section A--both way works) to locate the circumdiameter of this go section triangle: D = (a million/2)(x y²) / A the position A = component to triangle. The minimum for that is discovered through the regularly happening calculus skill, ensuing in a cubic root for x, it quite is plugged again into the above formula for the finest fee of 0.89561139330654. there is an actual expression for this fee, even with the indisputable fact that that's an boring mess, and that i have not been in a position to reduce it a lot. so some distance, besides. The cubic equation to sparkling up for x right that is: 3x³ - 6x² +7x - 2 = 0 the position x = 0.39125971029558 is the fee we favor. The link shows the mandatory diameter of the interest from a million to (2/3)?3, with the minimum at 0.8956, as defined in the first paragraph. Edit: This does recommend a risk of a toy puzzle, the position a good ring hangs from the waist of a good tetrahedron, which isn't precisely a real tetrahedron. After the hoop is taken off, it might want to correctly be a puzzle to detect a fashion to positioned it again on. Hmm, i imagine i like this idea. possibly locate procedures to make this even trickier? Edit 2: this kind of toy "warped" tetrahedron might want to have 24 procedures to attempt slipping the hoop over, in which there'd be in elementary words a million way for it to be accepted. combine that with a really warped ring (possibly of an ornamental toroidal structure), so as that it might want to correctly be a lengthy time period earlier one ultimately unearths a fashion to make it slip over to the waist. individual who's already experienced with this kind of toy might want to teach to others how truly he slips off the hoop, and then fingers the products to others for them to attempt rejoining them.
2016-12-04 08:42:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if you are jokin or what but I will inform you of the origin either way.
You know what the scribes and pharisees are right? ( The temple "priests" that were responsible for crucifying Jesus ) Well, one day they were trying to trick Jesus with questions so He may say something they could charge Him with ( for they feared they would lose rank or their precious seats in the synagogues )One question was "where do you get your authority?" Jesus replies " Where does John the baptist get his authority? Do you believe in his authority?" They talked amongst themselves reasoning that they couldn't say they didn't believe in John, because everyone knew who he was and that he baptized people. But they couldn't say they do believe in John either because John the baptist preached about Jesus as well saying " He is more than I, I am not worthy to tie His shoes." So they answer not, and Jesus replies " Then I will not tell you where I get my authority either."
Later he says " Woe you scribes and pharisees! Hypocrites! You would rather pass a camel thru the eye of a needle than believe the words of truth and lose your power. You wash the outside of the cup but not the inside."
I couldn't find it exactly but I'm pretty sure it's in John.
2006-10-06 14:11:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Aramaic, the language of Jesus, "rope" and "camel" are the same word, except one has a mark above it, not unlike an apostrophe, or an accent mark. For some reason, they thought camel was correct, when obviously, rope was the original word.
2006-10-06 13:18:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sky in the Grass 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
how else would you mince your camel ready for burgers?
The bits of angel that get in sometimes, improve the flavour.
2006-10-06 22:14:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eh?
2006-10-06 13:10:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋