So Christians believe in Evolution when it suits them but not when it doesn't. Isn't this a bit woolly

Question

The ship Noah had was just longer than a football field (end zones included), 25 yards wide and 15 yards tall. It had 3 levels. Noah was not instucted to get every form of each species, just the kinds of animals. He didn't need to get every breed of dog, just dogs. Also, he didn't need to get any fish for obvious reasons. The range of species we have today are a result of the more realistic form of evolution so to speak. I am not saying that evolution is what created these species because that is absurd and scientifically considered so unlikely it is impossible. Just like some breeds of dogs were breed in China that through intentional breeding altered the look of the dog. The point is that the genetic material was already there because God created it the animal, not because a massless pond scum evolved into a human with 60,000 nerve endings in their eye alone. Also I believe the animals came to Noah.After all he lived several hundred years, he had plenty of time to get all the animals

This was one of the responses to this question

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjUMaEsjMqdukkt05pWUpLwgBgx.?qid=20061004180659AAkULuj

Answer 1

anything to make the stories seem true...

Answer 2

You obviously have not heard of micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Micro evolution is an undeniable fact, it is observable in nature and can be demonstrated by selective breeding. Micro evolution in nature, is simply adaptive variation within an existing gene pool. This is the same mistake Darwin made, he saw adaptive variation in the Galapagos finches, and looked at selective breeding and wrongly assumed that they was no limit to this variation. Of course, breeders are well aware that there is a limit (he should have asked them).
Macro-evolution is a totally different kettle of fish. It cannot be observed, has no good evidence to support it, and it actually goes against several Laws of Science and modern, information theory. In other words it is unscientific.
Macro-evolution is the progessive evolution that says, life originated from non-life of its own accord, that the first simple cells gradually evolved into ever more complex organisms eventually developing into fish, reptiles, birds animals and ultimately humans. Firstly, life cannot just spontaneously generate itself from non-life, this goes against several, scientific Laws. So this is a fairy story.
Next for macro (progressive) evolution to take place new information has to be added to an existing gene pool. There is no known mechanism by which this can happen. Evolutionists claim that mutations are the mechanism. Mutations are genetic, copying MISTAKES. They cannot add any useful information, as we would expect from mistakes, they are generally harmful and cause genetic illnesses and deformities. There is no known example of a wholly, beneficial mutation. Information Theory says that, information cannot be created in this way by naturalistic means.
Of course, any sensible Christian and scientist must accept micro-evolution, but macro-evolution is merely an unscientific belief which is entirely a matter of opinion whether you wish to believe it or not. Any good scientist will not accept it as science and I would not expect any Christians to accept it either, especially as it is not compatible with much of the Bible.

Answer 3

I would like to know if they truly know; that this question is just because this person is bored or has special needs....
When ur mom and dad had u: do u look like mom or dad.... when 2 mix together = make something new(different)........
so dogs ,cats,horses,so on,,,,,, since the beginning of time( A long,long time ) people(humans) have mixed 2 different things 2 make something NEW>>>>>>That how we have what we have today......

chocolate syrup mixed with white milk make brown milk

Answer 4

Uh, some of believe in evolution, just not as how we came to exist. I believe we do evolve, but only specific to our species. I dont believe a worm became a bird, or a tadpole became a dog.

Answer 5

So, you don't believe this:- that evolution is what created these species

But you're quite happy to believe this:-
26 Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." 27 So God created man in His [own] image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
..............that God, or the gods, or the angels or whoever," Us..in Our image..", is/are, even though they.according to Him/themselves look suspicously like mammals?
How anthropomorphic of you!

Answer 6

Creationists and Evolutionist both believe in adaptation of animals to their environments...

Creatioist believe the information for the adaptations and the ability to adapt was in the design

Answer 7

What do you expect from people that think a book of bronze age jewish mythology is fact, yet disregard the Science of Evolution because it's "a theory"?
They are, and remain, utter morons.

Answer 8

whos to say we don't believe in evolution, genisis fits evolution almost to the T however, we don't see how we came from the monkey.