One man's crutch is another man's firewood. I wouldn't want to have one ounce less cognitive ability, and I envy those with more.
2006-10-06 08:45:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would have to define "normal" for me!
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." Jiddu Krishnamurti
Intellect is neither a crutch nor a liability unless the society you happen to live in perceives it as such. Instead, intellect is a part of the wellspring of our greatest gift. Creativity.
2006-10-06 08:50:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by gjstoryteller 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I feel that the greater the intellect, the more normal the person is to me. No one is just like anyone else, exactly. So what is normal? Religion is the crutch, our intellects are our wings to soar above the dullards with. Enjoy the view, and bombs away!
2006-10-06 08:39:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Let's not forget about narcissism (too many "s" sounds to be spelled right, but you know the word, of course) - with healthy amounts of self-aggrandizement, cleverness in staggering amounts, and pithiness, a word that I like, in great supply. Lots and lots of ego, and no small amount of exaggerated self-worth.
Being normal for even two minutes would most likely be fatal for you... as you would be sucked into such a huge vacuum, when you survey the massive, gaping canyon between your infinite wisdom and the paltry pea-brainedness of the rest of us...
Wish for other things, oh great one of the R&S section... waste not any more time on the meek minions who adore you...
2006-10-06 10:13:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have an ability to get inside of people's heads, so to speak, and feel what they are feeling and thinking. Those of low intellect are not pleasant to 'perceive', as a rule. If that is what is 'normal' I'm glad I am not 'normal'. They suspect they are not as smart, it is a vague feeling they have and it makes them very resentful.
Of course some people are sweet and not so bright, I think they are the luckiest of all of us.
2006-10-06 09:02:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by a_delphic_oracle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would suggest that intellect can be both an asset and a liability. I am normal...just an intelligent normal person...
2006-10-06 08:39:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our intellect gives us the capacity to be gods, our mortality causes us to rush while making decisions. This is the flaw in humanity. If only Adam had run faster and got to the tree of life.
2006-10-06 08:40:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like your describing some professors I know that are a little strange from being so far into the world of acedemia, like I knew one that just loved everything to do with fungus - it was a little scary...but for the most part I think intelect is a good thing.
Question: What exactly does normal mean to you?
2006-10-06 08:40:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by daisyk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
And who defines what is 'normal'? I don't see my intellect as a crutch.. I see it as a doorway.. it's your choice to use it and step through or to turn away from it and always wonder what's behind the door....
2006-10-06 08:40:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by genaddt 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the basic answer on your question is that human beings didn’t evolve from a decrease existence type, and evolutionists have shown continuously that we didn’t of their efforts to show we did. Your question has been asked in diverse suggestions on a thank you to evolutionists many circumstances, and to date, they have never been able to furnish a valid clarification as to why it is that in the time of the different case the place they declare a species has developed from a decrease existence type, the decrease existence type no longer exists alongside with the developed type, different than the apes and human beings. their very own regulations, and good judgment itself, makes this subject impossible, since the different species they declare has developed right into a extra more suitable species has been the completed species, and not a chosen team from interior of that species. in spite of interior of sight evolution of a species, the species continues to be comparable. Examples: Asians, Caucasians, Blacks, and so forth. are all nonetheless human. Horses of all length nonetheless have hooves and are quite recognizable as a horse, regardless of their length. All birds, flightless or no longer, nonetheless look like birds and function beaks and feathers. And all of those, and the different species, have the fairly same mind as their cousins. Apes and human beings are the only exception to this rule. constantly bear in mind that evolutionists are like politicians. while presented data that their theories are incorrect, even by their very own regulations, they only part step the priority and create the phantasm that they have data to show they are appropriate, and say that extra examine is critical to furnish the required data to reply to the question correct. Amateurs will attempt to reply to your question, yet a valid scientist that is familiar with what he’s speaking approximately won’t. those interior the previous that have tried have shown to be a humiliation to the evolutionist community. a minimum of a magician would be truthful and inform you his tricks are all smoke and mirrors, whether he won’t exhibit his secrets and strategies. Evolutionists will attempt to make you suspect in magic.
2016-10-15 22:06:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are bi-polar, maybe.
Normal is relative to each person.
Thinking about trying to be normal for two minutes could be considered abnormal, I suspect.
Trying to find a baseline that is consistent could be like finding a needle in a haystack.
Is normal a conscious state or is it the subliminal subconscious?
2006-10-06 08:45:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by dyke_in_heat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋